Njuguna Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 1200 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2008 to 2025; busiest year 2025 (28 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (9); Affirmed (7); Appeal allowed (3); The appeal was dismissed. (1)
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application: Application dismissed (4)
- Civil: Appeal dismissed (2); Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff (1); The Defendant's application is dismissed with costs. (1); The court granted the first application. (1)
- Appeal: Affirmed (2); Struck out (1)
- Criminal Appeal: The application is granted. (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (10)
- Civil Procedure Rules (8)
- Small Claims Court Act (5)
- Law of Succession Act (4)
- Criminal Procedure Code (4)
- Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (4)
- Penal Code (3)
- Limitation of Actions Act (2)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the original trial outcome (37), Appeal from conviction and sentence (30), Appeal from a conviction and sentence (15)
- [Civil] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 10/143, Application dismissed: 8/143, Dismissed: 6/143, Granted: 5/143
- [Criminal Case] outcomes — The accused is granted bail.: 1/1
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 100/416, Appeal allowed: 38/416, Appeal successful: 13/416, Appeal granted: 9/416
- [Preliminary Objection] outcomes — Dismissed: 2/5, Defendant's Preliminary Objection dismissed: 1/5, Struck out with costs to the Respondents: 1/5, The Plaint is struck out with no orders as to costs.: 1/5
- [Miscellaneous Application] outcomes — Application dismissed: 6/61, Application granted: 3/61, Appeal dismissed: 3/61, Application allowed: 2/61
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~11910 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Stay of execution pending appeal (11)
- Stay of execution (8)
- Reinstatement of the suit (7)
- Award of costs of the suit (6)
- Costs of the suit (5)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.3
- Frequently applied statutes: Civil Procedure Act (142), Civil Procedure Rules (136), Criminal Procedure Code (51), Penal Code (42), Evidence Act (23)
Sample decisions
SALIM MOHAMED NAKASHA v JAMES NJOROGE MBATIA T/A JOYLAND AUCTIONEERS & 2 others [2009] KEHC 667 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2009] KEHC 667 (KLR)
REPUBLIC V JOHN KIRUGI MWANIKI [2013] KEHC 3131 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2013] KEHC 3131 (KLR) · 30 May 2013
Rift valley Roses (K) Ltd v Benki Lepirkine [2014] KEHC 578 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2014] KEHC 578 (KLR) · 19 December 2014
Kenya Power & Lighting Company v Njumbi Residents Association & another [2015] KEHC 1094 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 1094 (KLR) · 19 November 2015
Project Innovations Limited v Aziza Residential Suites Limited & another [2015] KEHC 1169 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 1169 (KLR) · 19 November 2015
Lawrence Mukubu & another v Loise Wamaitha Kimani [2015] KEHC 1187 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 1187 (KLR) · 19 November 2015
Rosemary Wanjiku Ngigi v Moses Kamori Ngigi [2015] KEHC 1248 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 1248 (KLR) · 19 November 2015
George Ngichiri Karori & another v Anne Wangui Wahome & another [2015] KEHC 204 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 204 (KLR)
Kenya Nut Limited v Samson Ogutu Rachar (Civil Appeal 37 of 2015) [2015] KEHC 206 (KLR) (Civ) (17 December 2015) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 206 (KLR) · 17 December 2015
Kenya Nut Limited v Peter Mugo Wathoni [2015] KEHC 207 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 207 (KLR) · 17 December 2015