Dyson L Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 37 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2016 to 2024; busiest year 2020 (20 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Judicial Review Application: The ex parte Applicant is granted leave to commence judicial (4); Leave granted (2); The Court granted the leave to institute judicial review pro (1); Grant of leave to institute judicial review proceedings and (1)
- Judicial Review: The ex parte Applicant is granted leave to commence judicial (4); Leave granted (3); The Court grants the leave to commence judicial review proce (2); The application is granted. (2)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Rules (13)
- Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules (4)
- Fair Administrative Action Act (4)
- Tax Procedures Act 2015 (2)
- Medical Laboratory (Equipment and Reagents Validation) Regulations of 2011 (1)
- Land Adjudication Act (1)
- Constitution of Kenya, 2010 (1)
- Fair Administrative Actions Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Application for Leave to Institute Judicial Review Proceedings (11), Application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings (5), Application for leave to institute judicial review proceedings (3)
- [Judicial Review] outcomes — Leave granted: 3/24, The ex parte Applicant is granted leave to commence judicial review proceedings.: 3/24, The application is granted.: 2/24, The court denied the application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings and ordered the applicants to be reinstated.: 1/24
- [Judicial Review Application] outcomes — The ex parte Applicant is granted leave to commence judicial review proceedings.: 4/13, Leave granted: 2/13, Leave granted to commence judicial review proceedings but no stay of proceedings.: 1/13, The court declined to grant the applicant leave to operate as a stay and did not find that the applicant has established entitlement to an order for review.: 1/13
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~19531 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Status quo maintained until ruling is delivered (1)
- Reinstatement of the applicants (1)
- Stay of proceedings in Criminal Case No. E1235 of 2020 registered against the Applicant, before the Chief Magistrate's Court at Kibera, on charges of inviting members of the public to betting without a license from the Betting Control and Licensing Board contrary to Section 14 (l)(d) of the Betting, Lotteries and Gaming Act Cap 131 Laws of Kenya. (1)
- None specified (1)
- Mandamus to compel re-admission of the review (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 4.9
- Frequently applied statutes: Civil Procedure Rules (12), Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules (4), Fair Administrative Action Act (3), Tax Procedures Act 2015 (2), Fair Administrative Action Act No. 4 of 2015 (1)
Sample decisions
Gachugi v Kenya Tea Development Holdings Ltd & 2 others; Kanyango (Interested Party) (Judicial Review 577 of 2016) [2016] KEHC 227 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (25 November 2016) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2016] KEHC 227 (KLR) · 25 November 2016
Sun Africa Hotels Limited & another v Kenya Revenue Authority & 2 others [2018] KEHC 2929 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2018] KEHC 2929 (KLR)
Sun Africa Hotels Limited & another v Kenya Revenue Authority & 2 others [2018] KEHC 3026 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2018] KEHC 3026 (KLR)
Solomon Muyeka Alubala v Capital Markets Authority & another [2018] KEHC 5004 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2018] KEHC 5004 (KLR)
Munir Sheikh Ahmed v Capital Markets Authority [2018] KEHC 5016 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2018] KEHC 5016 (KLR) · 2 August 2018
Republic v Kenya Airports Authority & another Exparte Irene Elizabeth Wanjiku Kisangi; Abel Gogo & another (Interested Parties) [2019] KEHC 639 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2019] KEHC 639 (KLR) · 24 December 2019
Republic v National Hospital Insurance Fund Management Board Exparte Patanisho Maternity and Nursing Home [2019] KEHC 9549 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2019] KEHC 9549 (KLR) · 27 February 2019
Republic v Betting Control and Licensing Board; Safaricom Limited & 3 others (Interested Parties) Ex parte Milestone Games Limited [2020] KEHC 1188 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 1188 (KLR) · 16 November 2020
Republic v Director of Criminal Investigations & 2 others; Betting Control and Licensing Board (Interested Party) Ex Parte Bernard Chauro [2020] KEHC 1226 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 1226 (KLR) · 17 November 2020
Gibb Africa Limited v Engineers Board of Kenya [2020] KEHC 1240 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 1240 (KLR)