Rimita Rimita Beta

AI-derived reasoning profile from published judgments — experimental, verify everything against the decisions themselves.

Decisions41 Period1994-2023 Confidencemedium Name variants merged5CourtsKEHC

Also appears asD. M. Rimita; D.M. RIMITA; Mr. Justice Rimita; Rimita

Read this first — limitations.

Main subject areas

kehc (29)

Published decisions from 1996 to 2018; busiest year 2004 (6 decisions).

Civil: Appeal dismissed (2); Appeal allowed (1); The charge dated 26th May, 1999 is valid in law and a statut (1); The Plaintiffs' application for an interim injunction is gra (1)
Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (2)
Appeal: Appeal dismissed (2); The plaintiff's appeal was dismissed. (1)
Land Dispute: Plaintiff wins ownership of parcels K396 and K397, defendant (1)
Interlocutory Injunction: The Plaintiff's application for interim injunctive orders is (1)

Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.

Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the original trial outcome (1), Applicant seeks to quash a recommendation in a Judicial Commission of Inquiry report (1), Appeal from a lower court decision (1)
[Civil Suit] outcomes — Judgment for the plaintiff: 1/5, The Originating Summons was allowed.: 1/5, The suit was struck with costs to the defendants.: 1/5, The application for inhibition and injunction is dismissed.: 1/5
[Judicial Review] outcomes — The recommendation is quashed: 1/5, Judicial Review is struck out with costs to the Respondents.: 1/5, The decision of the Chief Magistrate to adopt the award of the Nakuru District Land Disputes Tribunal is quashed.: 1/5, The Republic's appeal was successful.: 1/5
[Civil] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 2/9, The Plaintiffs' application for an interim injunction is granted.: 1/9, The consent order is set aside, and the application for summary judgment is reinstated.: 1/9, Defendant wins.: 1/9
[Contempt] outcomes — Denied the application for extension of the stay of execution of the contempt order: 1/1
[Personal Injury] outcomes — The plaintiff was awarded Ksh.150,000 in general damages for pain and suffering.: 1/1

The applicant is not to be investigated for tribal clashes in Kericho District (1)
Interim injunction (1)
Reinstatement of the application for summary judgment (1)
Leave to prosecute the case (1)
Costs awarded to the defendant (1)

Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.0
Frequently applied statutes: Civil Procedure Rules (2), Civil Procedure Act (2), Fatal Accident’s Act (1), Law Reform Act (1), Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Tribal Clashes in Kenya Act (Cap. 102) (1)