Wanjirũ Ngige Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 6 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2013 to 2022; busiest year 2022 (7 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Political Parties Disputes: The 2nd respondent is ordered to make a determination on the (1); The Complaint is merited and allowed. (1); The 1st Respondent’s nomination of the 2nd Respondent was re (1); The Complaint is allowed. (1)
- Political Parties Dispute: Dismissal of the Complaint (1)
- Employment Dispute: The dismissal was found to be unfair. (1)
- Civil: Dismissed (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Political Parties Act (2)
- Political Parties Act, 2011 (2)
- Civil Procedure Act (1)
- Political Parties Disputes Tribunal (Procedure) Regulations 2017 (1)
- Political Parties Disputes (Procedure) Regulations 2017 (1)
- Constitution of Kenya 2010 (1)
- Fair Administrative Actions Act No. 4 of 2015 (1)
- Employment Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from original trial (1), Appeal from a decision of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (Interested Party) to the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal (1), Appeal from a decision of the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal (1)
- [Political Parties Dispute] outcomes — Dismissal of the Complaint: 1/1
- [Political Parties Disputes] outcomes — The Complaint is merited and allowed.: 1/4, The 1st Respondent’s nomination of the 2nd Respondent was revoked.: 1/4, The Complaint is struck out.: 1/4, The Complaint is allowed.: 1/4
- [Civil] outcomes — Dismissed: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~19730 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- The Complainant will be the 2nd Respondent’s nominee for the position of Member of County Assembly, North Gem Ward. (1)
- Revocation of the 2nd Respondent's nomination. (1)
- Fresh nomination exercise by the 1st Respondent. (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.3
- Frequently applied statutes: Political Parties Act, 2011 (2), Political Parties Disputes Tribunal (Procedure) Regulations 2017 (1), Political Parties Act (1), Political Parties Disputes (Procedure) Regulations 2017 (1), Constitution of Kenya 2010 (1)
Sample decisions
Khalif v Orange Democratic Movement Party & another; Kapeen (Interested Party) (Complaint E037 (NRB) of 2022) [2022] KEPPDT 1047 (KLR) (Civ) (16 May 2022) (Judgment)
Public Procurement Tribunal · [2022] KEPPDT 1047 (KLR) · 16 May 2022
Odhiambo v National Elections Board & 2 others; Independent Electoral And Boundaries Commission (Interested Party) (Complaint E029 (KSM) of 2022) [2022] KEPPDT 1059 (KLR) (8 June 2022) (Judgment)
Public Procurement Tribunal · [2022] KEPPDT 1059 (KLR) · 8 June 2022
Oiro v Jubilee Party & another (Cause E036 (NRB) of 2022) [2022] KEPPDT 1069 (KLR) (Civ) (9 May 2022) (Judgment)
Public Procurement Tribunal · [2022] KEPPDT 1069 (KLR) · 9 May 2022
Nyaboke & another v Nyamweya & 2 others; Gisore & 5 others (Interested Parties) (Complaint E038 (KSM) of 2022) [2022] KEPPDT 961 (KLR) (9 September 2022) (Judgment)
Public Procurement Tribunal · [2022] KEPPDT 961 (KLR) · 9 September 2022
Oiro v Jubilee Party & another (Complaint E083 (NRB) of 2022) [2022] KEPPDT 980 (KLR) (Civ) (23 May 2022) (Judgment)
Public Procurement Tribunal · [2022] KEPPDT 980 (KLR) · 23 May 2022
Kamau v United Democratic Alliance; Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission (Interested Party) (Complaint E131 (NRB) of 2022) [2022] KEPPDT 994 (KLR) (Constitutional and Human Rights) (6 September 2022) (Judgment)
Public Procurement Tribunal · [2022] KEPPDT 994 (KLR) · 6 September 2022