Samuel Karanja Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 5 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2020 to 2023; busiest year 2022 (4 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent. (1); The appeal is partially successful, with the decision by the (1)
- Directions: The dispute is referred to EPRA for resolution. (1)
- Appeal: Appeal allowed (1); The Energy Tribunal issues directions to refer the dispute t (1)
- Civil: The dispute is referred to EPRA for resolution (1); The Plaintiff's claim for Kshs. 16,317,424/- and interest wa (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Energy Act, 2019 (3)
- Energy (Complaints and Disputes Resolution) Regulations, 2012 (3)
- Energy Act No. 1 of 2019 (1)
- Energy (Complaints and Disputes Resolution) Regulations 2012 (1)
- Energy Act (1)
- Civil Procedure Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from a decision of the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA) (2), Appeal from a decision to refer a dispute to EPRA (1), Appeal from a decision of the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (1)
- [Appeal] outcomes — Appeal allowed: 1/2, The Energy Tribunal issues directions to refer the dispute to EPRA.: 1/2
- [Civil] outcomes — The dispute is referred to EPRA for resolution: 1/1
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — The appeal is partially successful, with the decision by the Authority being irregular and set aside. The claim for refund is dismissed.: 1/1
- [Directions] outcomes — The dispute is referred to EPRA for resolution.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~18718 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Installation of a three phase service line and a standard three phase post-paid meter. (1)
- Revision of Energy (Complaints and Disputes Resolution) Regulations 2012. (1)
- Effective Complaints Handling Procedures. (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.0
- Frequently applied statutes: Energy Act, 2019 (3), Energy (Complaints and Disputes Resolution) Regulations, 2012 (3), Energy Act No. 1 of 2019 (1), Energy (Complaints and Disputes Resolution) Regulations 2012 (1), Energy Act (1)
Sample decisions
LG Kamweti Advocate v Kenya Power & Lighting Company Limited & another (Tribunal Appeal EPA/E005 of 2022) [2022] KEET 788 (KLR) (Civ) (5 October 2022) (Ruling)
KEET · [2022] KEET 788 (KLR) · 5 October 2022
Selline R Steel v Energy & Petroleum Regulatory Authority (Tribunal Appeal EPA 019 of 2022) [2022] KEET 790 (KLR) (Civ) (24 August 2022) (Directions)
KEET · [2022] KEET 790 (KLR) · 24 August 2022
Mbobu v Kenya Power and Lighting Limited KPLC (Tribunal Case E029 of 2022) [2022] KEET 833 (KLR) (Civ) (16 November 2022) (Ruling)
KEET · [2022] KEET 833 (KLR) · 16 November 2022
Mbuthia v Kenya Power & Lighting Company (Appeal E001 of 2022) [2022] KEET 890 (KLR) (Civ) (24 August 2022) (Ruling)
KEET · [2022] KEET 890 (KLR) · 24 August 2022
Gathayo v Kenya Power & Lighting Limited KPLC (Tribunal Case E006 of 2023) [2023] KEET 108 (KLR) (24 March 2023) (Directions)
KEET · [2023] KEET 108 (KLR) · 24 March 2023