Karanja Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 1441 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2005 to 2026; busiest year 2025 (40 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (23); Affirmed (12); Application dismissed (6); Appeal allowed (4)
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (15); Affirmed (13); Appeals dismissed (3); The appeal was dismissed. (2)
- civil: Appeal dismissed (7)
- Appeal: Appeal dismissed (6); Affirmed (2); Appeal allowed (2)
- Sexual Offence: Guilty (2)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Criminal Procedure Code (25)
- Penal Code (16)
- Sexual Offences Act (13)
- Evidence Act (11)
- Civil Procedure Act (11)
- Civil Procedure Rules (8)
- Appellate Jurisdiction Act (6)
- Law of Succession Act (6)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Second Appeal (75), Application for stay of execution pending appeal (36), Appeal from a High Court judgment (30)
- [Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 31/113, Appeal allowed: 8/113, Dismissed: 5/113, Application dismissed: 4/113
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 149/337, Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed: 8/337, Affirmed: 5/337, Appeal allowed: 4/337
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 207/729, Application dismissed: 57/729, Appeal allowed: 41/729, Dismissed: 31/729
- [Civil Application] outcomes — Application dismissed: 30/128, Dismissed: 16/128, Appeal dismissed: 10/128, The application is granted.: 6/128
- [civil] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 19/46, Appeal successful: 3/46, Appeal allowed: 3/46, Affirmed: 2/46
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~18008 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- None (5)
- Costs to the appellant (4)
- Set appellant free (3)
- Costs to the respondent (3)
- Costs to the applicant (3)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.1
- Frequently applied statutes: Criminal Procedure Code (95), Sexual Offences Act (76), Penal Code (73), Court of Appeal Rules (45), Evidence Act (39)
Sample decisions
MICHAEL OKECH ADEGA & 3 others v HENRY OMUSAMBAYI NANDWA & another [2008] KECA 185 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2008] KECA 185 (KLR) · 11 June 2008
Mark Wanjala Wanyama v Republic [2008] KECA 57 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2008] KECA 57 (KLR) · 7 November 2008
Omuse v Republic (Criminal Appeal 344 of 2006) [2009] KECA 440 (KLR) (29 May 2009) (Judgment)
Court of Appeal · [2009] KECA 440 (KLR) · 29 May 2009
PATRICK KEMONI KEMBOI v REPUBLIC [2010] KECA 178 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2010] KECA 178 (KLR) · 17 May 2010
Jayne Wangui Gachoka v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited [2012] KECA 10 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 10 (KLR) · 25 May 2012
SOMKEN PETROLEUM COMPANY LIMITED V NATIONAL OIL CORPORATION OF KENYA LIMITED & 3 OTHERS [2012] KECA 126 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 126 (KLR)
Daniel Guchu Mwaniki & 2 others v Republic [2012] KECA 143 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 143 (KLR) · 28 March 2012
Paul Mwisho Kitonyi v Republic [2012] KECA 144 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 144 (KLR) · 15 March 2012
Peter Odiwuor Ngoge T/A O.P. Ngoge & Associates v Washington Jalango Okumu [2012] KECA 15 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 15 (KLR) · 20 April 2012
Castrol Limited v Kobil Petroleum Limited [2012] KECA 160 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2012] KECA 160 (KLR) · 28 March 2012