Philip Tunoi Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 5 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2012 to 2019; busiest year 2012 (4 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Application to strike out and costs: Application dismissed, appeal adjourned (1)
- Disciplinary Proceedings: Reinstatement and Costs Awarded (1)
- Civil Appeal: The judgment of the First Instance Division is vacated as be (1); The appeal is allowed, and the reference is struck out. (1)
- Appeal: Appeal dismissed (1); The appeal is allowed, and the application is struck out for (1); The Court declined to issue a stay of the criminal proceedin (1)
- Civil Appeal (Application): The application for the recusal of the Hon. Mr. Justice Milt (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Supreme Court Act (1)
- Judicial Service Commission Act (1)
- East African Court of Justice Rules 2010 (1)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (1)
- East African Community Treaty (1)
- Article 30(2) of the EAC Treaty (1)
- Article 250 (1) of the Constitution (1)
- Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the Ruling of the First Instance Division (2), Application dismissed, appeal adjourned (1), Appeal from the dismissal of a Reference (1)
- [Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 1/2, The appeal is allowed, and the application is struck out for being filed outside the time limit prescribed under Article 30(2) of the EAC Treaty: 1/2
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — The appeal is allowed, and the reference is struck out.: 1/2, The judgment of the First Instance Division is vacated as being moot.: 1/2
- [Application to strike out and costs] outcomes — Application dismissed, appeal adjourned: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~25856 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- The costs of this Application are to be in the cause. (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.2
- Frequently applied statutes: African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (1), East African Court of Justice Rules 2010 (1), East African Community Treaty (1), Article 30(2) of the EAC Treaty (1)
Sample decisions
Attorney General of the Republic of Rwanda v Plaxeda Rugumba [2012] RC 1 (KLR)
RC · [2012] RC 1 (KLR) · 22 June 2012
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA V INDEPENDENT MEDICAL LEGAL UNIT [2012] RC 10 (KLR)
RC · [2012] RC 10 (KLR) · 15 March 2012
Omar Awadh Omar and 6 Others v Attorney-General of Uganda [2012] RC 11 (KLR)
RC · [2012] RC 11 (KLR) · 27 June 2012
Legal Brains Trust (LBT) Limited v Attorney General of the Republic of Uganda [2012] RC 3 (KLR)
RC · [2012] RC 3 (KLR) · 19 May 2012
Attorney General of the Republic of Uganda & another v Omar Awadh & 6 Others [2013] RC 7 (KLR)
RC · [2013] RC 7 (KLR) · 15 April 2013