Elizabeth Gachan Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 2 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2007 to 2011; busiest year 2011 (1 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Criminal Appeal: The court upheld the judgment of the High Court and dismisse (1); The appeal by the first appellant is allowed, her conviction (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Criminal Procedure Code (cap 75) (1)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Remedy patterns
- Set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held. (1)
Sample decisions
Gachanja & 7 others v Republic (Criminal Appeal (Application) 51 of 2004) [2007] KECA 491 (KLR) (6 July 2007) (Ruling)
Court of Appeal · [2007] KECA 491 (KLR) · 6 July 2007
Gachanja & 7 others v Republic (Criminal Appeal 51 of 2004) [2011] KECA 402 (KLR) (20 May 2011) (Judgment)
Court of Appeal · [2011] KECA 402 (KLR) · 20 May 2011