Lagat-Korir Lagat-Korir Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 411 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2011 to 2026; busiest year 2014 (86 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (58); Affirmed (19); Appeal upheld, sentence reduced (5); Appeal successful (4)
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (28)
- Criminal: Bail granted (15); Guilty (13); Application dismissed (10); Conviction and sentence upheld (8)
- Appeal: Appeal dismissed (9)
- Bail Application: Denied (7); Bail granted (6); Bail Granted (5); Granted (4)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Penal Code (106)
- Criminal Procedure Code (78)
- Civil Procedure Act (28)
- Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 (25)
- Sexual Offences Act (19)
- Section 203 of the Penal Code (16)
- Evidence Act (15)
- Civil Procedure Rules (14)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from a conviction and sentence (32), Appeal from conviction and sentence (25), Application for Bail (25)
- [Miscellaneous Application] outcomes — The application is granted.: 1/6, Dismissed: 1/6, Allowing the application: 1/6, The Application is struck out with no orders to costs.: 1/6
- [Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 5/12, Appeal dismissed, sentence reduced to 20 years: 1/12, Appeal successful, conviction and sentence quashed.: 1/12, Appeal not dismissed, set down for directions within 45 days: 1/12
- [civil] outcomes — Affirmed: 1/2, The appeal is partially successful, with the award revised downwards: 1/2
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 20/62, Appeal allowed: 2/62, Appeal successful: 2/62, Appeal granted: 2/62
- [Judicial Review] outcomes — The application is allowed in terms of prayer 1 and 2, to wit: an order of judicial review in the nature of certiorari, to remove into the high court and quash, the proceedings and decision of Trans-Mara Land Disputes Tribunal and the proceedings and decision of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court.: 1/8, Dismissed with costs: 1/8, The applicant is granted leave to apply for judicial review and the proceedings before the Land Disputes Tribunal are quashed.: 1/8, The judgment is reserved for the final orders section.: 1/8
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~14084 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Costs will abide the outcome of the suit (2)
- Stay of execution of the decree pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. (1)
- Security for costs deposited by the applicant. (1)
- Costs of the appeal and the lower court (1)
- Quash the award of the ex-parte applicant's land by the Trans-Mara Land Disputes Tribunal (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.8
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (51), Criminal Procedure Code (36), Civil Procedure Act (20), Sexual Offences Act (18), Constitution of Kenya (9)
Sample decisions
JOSEPHINE MORAA COSMAS V JOHN BOSCO MBOGA [2012] KEHC 1005 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1005 (KLR) · 23 August 2012
BROOKE BOND (K) LTD V ORPHA KEMUNTO BITANGE [2012] KEHC 1031 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1031 (KLR) · 21 September 2012
SOTIK TEA CO. LTD V DAVID KIPKORIR KIMETTO [2012] KEHC 1033 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1033 (KLR)
KRISBIANUS MOGOIGA MUCHUNI V THOMAS CHACHA MATIKO [2012] KEHC 1034 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1034 (KLR) · 21 September 2012
KENYA POWER & LIGHTING CO. LTD V DIANA ACHIENG OGUNYO [2012] KEHC 1035 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1035 (KLR) · 21 September 2012
REPUBLIC V TRANSMARA LAND DISPUTE TRIBUNAL & 2 OTHERS EXPARTE PAUL MUTAI [2012] KEHC 2095 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 2095 (KLR) · 21 September 2012
JUSTUS AYOTI OMONDI V NAFTAL RAGIRA ONCHWARI (Miscellaneous Application 245 of 2011) [2012] KEHC 2097 (KLR) (21 September 2012) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 2097 (KLR) · 21 September 2012
REPUBLIC V CONSTITUENCY DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANOTHER EX-PARTE HEARP CONSTRUCTION WORKS LIMITED [2012] KEHC 2100 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 2100 (KLR) · 21 September 2012
ANTONY NYANDIGA ORINA V GABRIEL OTIENO OGELO [2012] KEHC 2104 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 2104 (KLR) · 20 September 2012
PETER OTARA MASESE v KEUMBU LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL (KEUMBU DIVISION) [2012] KEHC 2105 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 2105 (KLR) · 21 September 2012