Simon L Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 6 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2006 to 2020; busiest year 2020 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Judicial Review: The ex parte applicant is in contempt of court and is denied (1); Application dismissed (1); The impugned decision is quashed. (1)
- Civil Application: The Court dismissed the application. (1)
- Petition: The court dismisses the petition. (1)
- Petition for Protection of Fundamental R: Conservatory orders granted (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act (2)
- Constitution of Kenya (2)
- Public Procurement and Disposal Regulations, 2006 (1)
- Commissions of Inquiry Act Cap 102 LOK (1)
- National Assembly (Powers and Privileges) Act Cap 6 LOK (1)
- Githunguri –Vs- Republic (1986) KLR I (1)
- Customs and Excise Act (1)
- East African Community Customs Management Act, 2009 (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Respondent's Motion for Judgment in His Favor (1), Respondents' appeal from a decision of the Customs and Excise Authority (1), Petitioner's Notice of Motion granted, Respondents have not filed a response (1)
- [Civil Application] outcomes — The Court dismissed the application.: 1/1
- [Petition] outcomes — The court dismisses the petition.: 1/1
- [Petition for Protection of Fundamental Rights] outcomes — Conservatory orders granted: 1/1
- [Judicial Review] outcomes — The ex parte applicant is in contempt of court and is denied the right of audience.: 1/3, Application dismissed: 1/3, The impugned decision is quashed.: 1/3
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~91097 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- The Applicant is granted a fair trial within a reasonable time. (1)
- Release of impounded goods (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 5.0
- Frequently applied statutes: Constitution of Kenya (2), Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act (2), Commissions of Inquiry Act Cap 102 LOK (1), National Assembly (Powers and Privileges) Act Cap 6 LOK (1), Githunguri –Vs- Republic (1986) KLR I (1)
Sample decisions
REPUBLIC v JUDICIAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO THE GOLDENBERG AFFAIR & 2 others EX PARTE GEORGE SAITOTI [2006] KEHC 1413 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2006] KEHC 1413 (KLR) · 31 July 2006
MOUNT KENYA BOTTLERS LIMITED & 3 OTHERS V ATTORNEY GEENRAL & 3 OTHERS [2012] KEHC 1152 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1152 (KLR) · 26 October 2012
Standard Resource Group Ltd v Attorney General & 2 others [2016] KEHC 3002 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2016] KEHC 3002 (KLR)
Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 2 others; Ex-Parte Central Kenya Fresh Merchants Limited [2018] KEHC 1203 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2018] KEHC 1203 (KLR) · 11 December 2018
Republic v Kenya Revenue Authority & another;Director of Criminal Investigations & another (Interested Party) Ex parte CMC DI Ravenna-Itinera JV [2020] KEHC 9234 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 9234 (KLR) · 17 January 2020
Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & another Ex parte Tropical Technology Limited [2020] KEHC 9235 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 9235 (KLR) · 17 January 2020