Sachdeva Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 45 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1978 to 2025; busiest year 2025 (4 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (3); Appeal allowed (2); Affirmed (1); The conviction was quashed. (1)
- Criminal Revision: The court declined to revise the decision of the trial court (1); The trial court's sentence is set aside, and a re-sentencing (1)
- Criminal Case: Not guilty (1)
- Bankruptcy & Winding-Up: The applicants' application is successful, and they must pay (1)
- Civil: Conditional leave to defend granted, defendants ordered to d (1); Interlocutory judgment in favor of the plaintiff for damages (1); Granted (1); The defendant is granted conditional leave to defend the sui (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Criminal Procedure Code (4)
- Penal Code (4)
- Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 (3)
- Sexual Offences Act, No. 3 of 2006 (3)
- Constitution of Kenya (3)
- Borstal Institutions Act (3)
- Children's Act (3)
- Sexual Offences Act, Act No. 3 of 2006 (2)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from conviction and sentence (6), Appeal Allowed (3), Appeal from a conviction and sentence (2)
- [Divorce] outcomes — Application dismissed: 1/2, Petition dismissed with costs: 1/2
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 5/26, Appeals dismissed: 3/26, Appeal Allowed: 2/26, Appeal against conviction dismissed, appeal against sentence successful: 1/26
- [Civil Application] outcomes — Application dismissed: 1/1
- [Civil] outcomes — The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendants.: 1/5, The court ordered the matter to be reconsidered and the bill of costs to be taxed again.: 1/5, The defendant is ordered to deposit Kshs 48,381.50 in court within 60 days.: 1/5, Motion for certiorari dismissed: 1/5
- [Criminal] outcomes — Conviction affirmed, sentence of imprisonment with the accused held in custody pending further proceedings.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~12250 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Set the appellant free (1)
- Fines paid and appellants released (1)
- Deposit of Kshs 48,381.50 in court (1)
- Sentences of nine months imprisonment (1)
- Discharge the appellant from custody (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.6
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (11), Criminal Procedure Code (6), Traffic Act (2), Penal Code (Cap 63) (2), Debtors Act, 1869 (1)
Sample decisions
M W v J K [1976] KEHC 13 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1976] KEHC 13 (KLR)
Bennalt Oinamo v Republic [1976] KEHC 18 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1976] KEHC 18 (KLR) · 22 June 1976
Sahal Mohamed Hussein v Republic [1976] KEHC 25 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1976] KEHC 25 (KLR) · 9 February 1976
Ng’ang’a v Republic [1976] KEHC 36 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1976] KEHC 36 (KLR) · 11 February 1976
Thomas Wakitata v Republic [1977] KEHC 1 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1977] KEHC 1 (KLR)
Muchoki Irima & 2 others v Republic [1977] KEHC 11 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1977] KEHC 11 (KLR) · 5 October 1977
Republic v Francis Wahome [1977] KEHC 14 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1977] KEHC 14 (KLR) · 27 July 1977
Charles Lusiti v Republic [1977] KEHC 15 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1977] KEHC 15 (KLR) · 12 July 1977
Muriuki Kimondo v Francis Maina & 2 others [1977] KEHC 17 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1977] KEHC 17 (KLR) · 17 June 1977
Njoki Gachugu & 3 others v Francis Githi & 3 others [1977] KEHC 18 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1977] KEHC 18 (KLR) · 25 May 1977