Barabara Tanui Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 1 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1985 to 2025; busiest year 2004 (25 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (6); Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed (3); Appeal dismissed, sentence reduced (1); Appeal allowed, conviction quashed, fine refunded (1)
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (5); Abated and struck out with costs to the respondent. (2)
- Civil: Dismissed (3); The case is closed and transferred to the Environment and La (1); The court allowed the application with costs against the def (1); Granted (1)
- Miscellaneous Civil Application: Dismissed with costs (2)
- Civil Suit: Dismissed with costs (1); The application is allowed. (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (5)
- Penal Code (5)
- Civil Procedure Rules (3)
- Criminal Procedure Code (3)
- Law Reform Act (2)
- Articles 162 (2) (b) and 165 (5) (b) of the Constitution (1)
- Order 14 rule 3 of Civil Procedure Rules (1)
- Order 14 rule 3(3) 5(1) and (2) (1)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Sample decisions
Benson Ondimu Masese T/A & another v Kenya Tea Development Agency Ltd [2007] KECA 288 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2007] KECA 288 (KLR) · 20 June 2007