Maureen Onyango Beta

AI-derived reasoning profile from published judgments — experimental, verify everything against the decisions themselves.

Decisions1,964 Period2000-2026 Confidencehigh Name variants merged23CourtsKEELRC

Also appears asD.O. Onyango; HON. LADY JUSTICE M. ONYANGO; HON. LADY JUSTICE MAUREEN ONYANGO; HON. LADY MAUREEN ONYANGO; Hon. Lady Justice Maureen Onyango; J Njeri Onyango; J. J. Onyango; J.M. Onyango

Read this first — limitations.

Patterns reflect published decisions only.
This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
Based on 1749 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.

Main subject areas

keelrc (1749)

Activity

Published decisions from 2000 to 2026; busiest year 2018 (349 decisions).

Documented outcomes by case type

Appeal: Appeal dismissed (29); Appeal allowed (8); Affirmed (6)
Employment Dispute: Affirmed (27); Claim dismissed (16); Dismissed (15); In favor of the Claimant (12)
Labor Dispute: Affirmed (17); Appeal dismissed (9); Dismissed (8)
Unfair Dismissal: Affirmed (13); Claimant wins (6)
Labour Dispute: Dismissed (12); Application dismissed (12); Appeal dismissed (6)

Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.

Most-cited legislation

Employment Act (487)
Employment Act, 2007 (201)
Labour Relations Act (91)
Civil Procedure Act (88)
Employment Act 2007 (87)
Employment and Labour Relations Court Act (59)
Limitation of Actions Act (58)
Constitution of Kenya, 2010 (49)

Documented reasoning patterns

Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the original trial (181), Appeal from an original trial decision (130), Claimant vs Respondent (77)
[Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 26/96, Appeal allowed: 7/96, Application dismissed: 5/96, Affirmed: 5/96
[Employment Dispute] outcomes — Affirmed: 24/447, Claim dismissed: 16/447, Dismissed: 15/447, In favor of the Claimant: 11/447
[Trade Dispute] outcomes — Dismissed: 1/4, In favor of the Claimant: 1/4, The respondent is ordered to pay interest on the fees and to pay the 12 grievants as awarded by the court.: 1/4, Claimant's application for orders to be ordered back to work, pay costs, sign C.B.A, and comply with redundancy procedures is granted.: 1/4
[Industrial Dispute] outcomes — Affirmed: 7/72, Appeal dismissed: 6/72, Appeal upheld: 3/72, The claim is dismissed.: 3/72
[Unfair Termination and Failure to Pay Statutory Employment Dues] outcomes — In favor of the Claimant: 2/2

Writing characteristics

Median judgment length ~15160 words
Includes panel decisions

Remedy patterns

Compensation (50)
One month's salary in lieu of notice (40)
Compensation for unfair termination (31)
Service pay (19)
Costs (19)

Citation patterns

Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.8
Frequently applied statutes: Employment Act (464), Employment Act, 2007 (156), Labour Relations Act (89), Employment Act 2007 (85), Civil Procedure Act (79)