Bosire Chambers) Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 20 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1997 to 2011; busiest year 1997 (6 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Appeal: Extension of time granted (2); The application is granted. (2); The application for extension of time to file a notice of ap (1); The application for disqualification is granted, and the app (1)
- Civil Application: The application is granted. (1); The motion is certified as urgent. (1); The motion for urgency was not certified. (1); The application for stay of execution pending the filing and (1)
- Civil Appeal: Application dismissed (1)
- Criminal Appeal: The application is granted. (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Appellate Jurisdiction Ordinance (Act No.38 of 1962) (1)
- Civil Procedure Rules (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal (2), Application for extension of time to file and serve record of appeal (2), Application for extension of time to serve notice of appeal (1)
- [Appeal] outcomes — Extension of time granted: 2/13, The application is granted.: 2/13, The application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal is allowed.: 1/13, The application for disqualification is granted, and the application is adjourned to be relisted before another judge.: 1/13
- [Civil Application] outcomes — The application is granted.: 1/5, The motion for urgency was not certified.: 1/5, The motion is certified as urgent.: 1/5, The application for stay of execution pending the filing and determination of an intended appeal is denied.: 1/5
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Application dismissed: 1/1
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — The application is granted.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~2836 words
- Single-judge
Remedy patterns
- Costs of the application assessed at Kshs.2,000/= (1)
- The applicant will pay the costs of the application assessed at Kshs.5,000/= (1)
- Costs assessed at KShs.2,000/= (1)
- Costs of the application assessed at KShs.7,000/- to be paid within ten days in default, execution to issue (1)
- Costs of this application to the applicant assessed at KShs.2,500/= (two thousand five hundred), notwithstanding the request in the consent letter dated 22nd January, 2002, that costs be in the intended appeal. (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.1
- Frequently applied statutes: Appellate Jurisdiction Ordinance (Act No.38 of 1962) (1), Civil Procedure Rules (1)
Sample decisions
Kitonga Mbundu v Republic [1997] KECA 142 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1997] KECA 142 (KLR) · 25 September 1997
Kulalia Ngatia v Republic [1997] KECA 149 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1997] KECA 149 (KLR) · 25 September 1997
Republic v Peter Kaleli Mulwa [1997] KECA 152 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1997] KECA 152 (KLR) · 3 November 1997
WILSON ORITO OMUSINA vs JOHN KIMOSOP MAINA & 2 OTHERS [1997] KECA 187 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1997] KECA 187 (KLR)
JENIFFER NYAKINYUA WAMBUGU vs NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION [1997] KECA 258 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1997] KECA 258 (KLR) · 21 November 1997
Archdiocese of Kisumu v Phoebe Atieno Nyagudi [1997] KECA 259 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1997] KECA 259 (KLR) · 11 March 1997
JOSEPH YUMBYA KIMEU & ANOTHER v ROBERT NZISSI & 2 OTHERS [2000] KECA 185 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2000] KECA 185 (KLR) · 24 October 2000
National Oil Corporation of Kenya v Yess Holdings Limited [2000] KECA 332 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2000] KECA 332 (KLR) · 24 February 2000
Makarios Ngugi & 2 others v Registrar of Societies & 7 others [2000] KECA 62 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2000] KECA 62 (KLR) · 13 December 2000
Gibson King'au Lazaro v Republic [2001] KECA 249 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [2001] KECA 249 (KLR)