Lord Barr Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 6 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2020 to 2025; busiest year 2024 (4 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Affirmed the decision of the trial court. (1)
- Criminal Appeal: Affirmed (1); The conviction and sentence were upheld. (1); Affirmed the conviction and upheld the sentence (1); The appeal was dismissed. (1)
- Criminal: The Accused is sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment. (1)
- Criminal Revision: The applicant's request for further reduction of sentence is (1)
- Traffic Case: Appeal dismissed (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Penal Code (4)
- County Assembly Service Act, 2017 (cap 265D) sections 22 and 23. (1)
- Employment Act. (1)
- Public Finance Management Act (cap 412A) sections 3, 102, 103, 148, 149, 156. (1)
- Narcotic and Psychotropic Substance Control Act No.4 of 1994 (1)
- Evidence Act Cap 80 (1)
- Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 (1)
- Evidence Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from conviction and sentence (1), Appeal from a judgment of the learned trial Magistrate Hon. J.M. Macharia (P.M) in Garsen Criminal Case Number 115 of 2015 (1), Appeal from a conviction and sentence for sexual offenses (1)
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — The appeal was dismissed.: 1/4, Affirmed: 1/4, The conviction and sentence were upheld.: 1/4, Affirmed the conviction and upheld the sentence: 1/4
- [Criminal] outcomes — The Accused is sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment.: 1/1
- [Criminal Revision] outcomes — The applicant's request for further reduction of sentence is denied: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~23122 words
- Includes panel decisions
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 2.3
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (3), Interpretation Act (1), Narcotic and Psychotropic Substance Control Act No.4 of 1994 (1), Evidence Act Cap 80 (1), Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 (1)
Sample decisions
Hamisi Said v Republic [2020] KEHC 1075 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 1075 (KLR)
Radhia Ghamaharo Rashid v Republic [2021] KEHC 7901 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2021] KEHC 7901 (KLR) · 4 March 2021
Julo v Republic (Criminal Appeal E035 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 19366 (KLR) (15 June 2023) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [2023] KEHC 19366 (KLR) · 15 June 2023
Republic v Chepkwony (Criminal Case 18 of 2018) [2023] KEHC 20482 (KLR) (29 June 2023) (Sentence)
High Court of Kenya · [2023] KEHC 20482 (KLR) · 29 June 2023
Isiongo v Republic (Criminal Appeal 71 of 2012) [2024] KEHC 357 (KLR) (25 January 2024) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [2024] KEHC 357 (KLR) · 25 January 2024
Wasike v Republic (Criminal Revision E005 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 6608 (KLR) (5 June 2024) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2024] KEHC 6608 (KLR) · 5 June 2024