Mathews Nduma Beta

AI-derived reasoning profile from published judgments — experimental, verify everything against the decisions themselves.

Decisions1,704 Period2012-2026 Confidencehigh Name variants merged13CourtsKEELRC

Also appears asHON. M. N. NDUMA; Hon. Mr. Justice Mathews Nderi Nduma; M. Nduma; M.N Nduma; Mathews N. Nduma; Mathews Nderi Nduma; Nduma; Nduma Nduma

Read this first — limitations.

Patterns reflect published decisions only.
This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
Based on 1549 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.

Main subject areas

keelrc (1549)

Activity

Published decisions from 2012 to 2026; busiest year 2018 (270 decisions).

Documented outcomes by case type

Appeal: Appeal dismissed (27); Application dismissed (6); Dismissed with costs (6)
Labour Dispute: Application dismissed (17); Dismissed (13); Appeal dismissed (11)
Employment Dispute: Claimant wins (14); Dismissed (10); Affirmed (9); In favor of the claimant (8)
Industrial Dispute: Appeal dismissed (8)
Miscellaneous Application: Dismissed (8)

Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.

Most-cited legislation

Employment Act, 2007 (312)
Employment Act (135)
Employment Act 2007 (93)
Constitution of Kenya 2010 (61)
Labour Relations Act, 2007 (40)
Civil Procedure Act (35)
Constitution of Kenya, 2010 (27)
Labour Relations Act (23)

Documented reasoning patterns

Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the original trial (94), Appeal from a previous judgment (47), Appeal from a decision of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (46)
[Industrial Dispute] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 8/76, Application dismissed: 5/76, Claimant wins: 4/76, Affirmed: 3/76
[Labor Dispute] outcomes — Dismissed: 5/125, Claimant wins: 4/125, Affirmed: 4/125, Dismissed with costs: 4/125
[Unlawful and unfair termination of employment] outcomes — Claimant wins: 2/8, Claimant receives partial relief in the form of overtime pay and payment of leave days: 1/8, In favour of the claimant: 1/8, In favour of the Claimant: 1/8
[Industrial Dismissal Case] outcomes — Dismissed with no order as to costs: 1/2, Dismissal with costs: 1/2
[Industrial Court] outcomes — Dismissed: 6/32, Appeal dismissed: 4/32, Application dismissed: 3/32, Application dismissed with costs: 2/32

Writing characteristics

Median judgment length ~8355 words
Includes panel decisions

Remedy patterns

Costs of the suit (41)
Compensation (27)
Notice pay (23)
Compensation for unlawful dismissal (21)
Compensation for unlawful termination (20)

Citation patterns

Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.5
Frequently applied statutes: Employment Act, 2007 (287), Employment Act (118), Employment Act 2007 (85), Constitution of Kenya 2010 (54), Labour Relations Act, 2007 (40)