Dugdale Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 2 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2016 to 2025; busiest year 2025 (1 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (1)
- Appeal: The appeal was allowed, the judgment of the Court of Appeal (1)
- Judicial Review: Affirmed (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Consumer Protection Act (1)
- Standard Act (1)
- Food, Drugs and Chemical Substances Act (1)
- Article 163(4) of the Constitution (1)
- Constitution of Kenya 2010 (1)
- Judicial Service Commission Act (1)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Remedy patterns
- 2nd and 3rd appellants set at liberty (1)
Sample decisions
Kamau & 2 others v Republic [1988] KEHC 37 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1988] KEHC 37 (KLR) · 27 October 1988
Maathai v Kenya Times Media Trust Ltd (Civil Appeal 5403 of 1989) [1989] KEHC 82 (KLR) (Civ) (11 December 1989) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [1989] KEHC 82 (KLR) · 11 December 1989