Njue Clerk Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 10 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2007 to 2007; busiest year 2007 (10 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal allowed (2)
- Criminal: NOT GUILTY (2)
- Civil: The application is dismissed. (1); Appeal allowed (1)
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed (1)
- Miscellaneous Civil Application: Dismissed (1); The orders of certiorari are granted. (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Coffee Act 2002 (2)
- Coffee (Election) Rules 2002 (2)
- Land Control Act (1)
- Sexual Offences Act (Act No. 3 of 2000) (1)
- Penal Code Section 144 (1) (1)
- Civil Procedure Act (1)
- Interpretation and General Provisions Act 2002 (1)
- Registered Land Act Cap. 300 (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from a conviction of murder (2), Appeal from a decision of the Central Division Land Dispute Tribunal (1), Respondent sought to quash the elections organized by the Minister for Agriculture (1)
- [Misc Civil Appli] outcomes — The court dismissed the application and upheld the decision of the tribunal.: 1/1
- [Miscellaneous Application] outcomes — The orders of certiorari are granted: 1/1
- [Civil] outcomes — The application is dismissed.: 1/2, Appeal allowed: 1/2
- [Miscellaneous Civil Application] outcomes — The orders of certiorari are granted.: 1/1
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal allowed: 2/2
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~4247 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Quashing of the elections (1)
- Stay of execution of the decree (1)
- The appellant shall be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.0
- Frequently applied statutes: Coffee Act 2002 (2), Coffee (Election) Rules 2002 (2), Lands Disputes Tribunal Act 18 of 1990 (1), Registered Land Act (1), Interpretation and General Provisions Act 2002 (1)
Sample decisions
REPUBLIC v KERUGOYA CENTRAL DIVISION LAND DISPUTE TRIBUNAL & 2 OTHERS EXPARTE FRANCIS MAINA MURIUKI [2006] KEHC 175 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2006] KEHC 175 (KLR) · 23 January 2006
REPUBLIC v MINISTER FOR AGRICULTURE [2007] KEHC 1018 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2007] KEHC 1018 (KLR) · 15 March 2007
MIKIKI FARMERS CO-OP SOCIETY v THIKA COFFEE MILLS LTD & ANOTHER [2007] KEHC 1031 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2007] KEHC 1031 (KLR) · 24 January 2007
JAMES WARIUWA GACHANJA & 3 OTHERS v LEAH KASYOKA MWILU [2007] KEHC 1033 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2007] KEHC 1033 (KLR) · 6 March 2007
REPUBLIC v MINISTER FOR AGRICULTURE [2007] KEHC 152 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2007] KEHC 152 (KLR) · 15 March 2007
JAMES WARIUWA GACHANJA & 3 OTHER v LEAH KASYOKA MWILU [2007] KEHC 326 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2007] KEHC 326 (KLR) · 6 March 2007
JAMLECK KIURA MURATHI v ANGELIUS GICHOBI KARURU & another [2007] KEHC 3527 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2007] KEHC 3527 (KLR) · 27 November 2007
QUARHANE GURE ALI v REPUBLIC [2007] [2007] KEHC 79 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2007] KEHC 79 (KLR) · 25 October 2007
REPUBLIC v LAWRENCE NGARI MBUKO [2007] KEHC 858 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2007] KEHC 858 (KLR) · 19 November 2007
REPUBLIC v LAWRENCE NGARI MBUKO [2007] KEHC 993 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2007] KEHC 993 (KLR) · 19 November 2007