Phyllis Chepkemboi Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 11 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2020 to 2021; busiest year 2020 (8 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Public Procurement Review: The County Government is ordered to re-evaluate Electorserve (1); The tender was cancelled and the applicant was ordered to pa (1); Dismissed (1); The Procuring Entity's actions are set aside and the procure (1)
- Administrative Review: The decision to award the tender to another company is annul (1); The Request for Review is successful with respect to the spe (1)
- Public Procurement Administrative Review: The Request for Review is dismissed. (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, 2015 (6)
- Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act (3)
- Integrated Financial Management System (IFMIS) Matrix system (1)
- Tender Document (1)
- Public Procurement Act (1)
- Interpretation and General Provisions Act (1)
- Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Regulations, 2020 (1)
- Value Added Tax Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Application for Review (9), Appeal from a decision to cancel a tender (1), Application for extension of tender validity period and award of the subject tender (1)
- [Public Procurement Review] outcomes — The Request for Review is dismissed.: 1/8, The County Government is ordered to re-evaluate Electorserve Limited's bid and make a new award within 14 days.: 1/8, The tender was cancelled and the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the review.: 1/8, Dismissed: 1/8
- [Public Procurement Administrative Review] outcomes — The Request for Review is dismissed.: 1/1
- [Administrative Review] outcomes — The decision to award the tender to another company is annulled, and the tender is returned to the Applicant for post-qualification evaluation.: 1/2, The Request for Review is successful with respect to the specific orders made.: 1/2
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~61047 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Re-evaluation of Electorserve Limited's bid (1)
- New award within 14 days (1)
- Cancellation of the tender (1)
- Extension of the tender validity period (1)
- Payment of costs (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.1
- Frequently applied statutes: Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, 2015 (6), Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act (3), Integrated Financial Management System (IFMIS) Matrix system (1), Public Procurement Administrative Review Board Act (1), Tender Document (1)
Sample decisions
Express Automation Limited v Accounting Officer, Kenya Ports Authority & another; Xrx Technologies Limited & another (Interested Parties) (Application 139 of 2020) [2020] KEPPARB 13 (KLR) (8 December 2020) (Decision)
KEPPARB · [2020] KEPPARB 13 (KLR) · 8 December 2020
Electorserve Limited v Accounting Officer, County Government of Kirinyaga & another; Top Choice Surveillance Limited (Respondent) (Application 45 of 2020) [2020] KEPPARB 21 (KLR) (14 April 2020) (Decision)
KEPPARB · [2020] KEPPARB 21 (KLR) · 14 April 2020
Rhombus Construction Company Limited v Accounting Officer, Kenya Ports Authority & another; Cargotec Finland Oy (Interested Party) (Application 131 of 2020) [2020] KEPPARB 31 (KLR) (23 October 2020) (Decision)
KEPPARB · [2020] KEPPARB 31 (KLR) · 23 October 2020
Avtech Systems Limited v Accounting Officer, County Assembly of Makueni & 2 others (Application 62 of 2020) [2020] KEPPARB 34 (KLR) (4 June 2020) (Decision)
KEPPARB · [2020] KEPPARB 34 (KLR) · 4 June 2020
Bytewise Limited v Accounting Officer, Kenya Civil Aviation Authority; Indra Limited (Interested Party) (Application 125 of 2020) [2020] KEPPARB 35 (KLR) (29 September 2020) (Decision)
KEPPARB · [2020] KEPPARB 35 (KLR) · 29 September 2020
Resolution Insurance Company Limited v Clerk, County Assembly of Transnzoia; Kenya Alliance Insurance Company (Interested Party) (Application 128 of 2020) [2020] KEPPARB 5 (KLR) (15 October 2020) (Decision)
KEPPARB · [2020] KEPPARB 5 (KLR) · 15 October 2020
Xtranet Communications Limited v Accounting Officer, Agriculture and Food Authority & another; Jenetworks Ventures Limited (Interested Party) (Application 48 of 2020) [2020] KEPPARB 7 (KLR) (27 April 2020) (Decision)
KEPPARB · [2020] KEPPARB 7 (KLR) · 27 April 2020
Amber Construction Limited v Accounting Officer, County Assembly of Machakos (Application 47 of 2020) [2020] KEPPARB 9 (KLR) (27 April 2020) (Decision)
KEPPARB · [2020] KEPPARB 9 (KLR) · 27 April 2020
Rhombus Construction Company Limited v Accounting Officer, Kenya Ports Authority & another (Application 150 of 2020) [2021] KEPPARB 11 (KLR) (6 January 2021) (Decision)
KEPPARB · [2021] KEPPARB 11 (KLR) · 6 January 2021
Five Blocks Enterprises Limited v Managing Director, KEBS & another (Application 13 of 2021) [2021] KEPPARB 24 (KLR) (23 February 2021) (Decision)
KEPPARB · [2021] KEPPARB 24 (KLR) · 23 February 2021