Shah Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 674 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1986 to 2026; busiest year 2024 (48 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (29); Affirmed (9); Appeal allowed (6); The appeal was dismissed. (2)
- Appeal: Appeal dismissed (6); Application dismissed (2); Appeal dismissed with costs (2)
- Criminal Appeal: Affirmed (5); Appeal dismissed (2)
- Civil: Appeal dismissed (5); Application dismissed (2)
- Civil Suit: Appeal dismissed (4); Granted (2)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (39)
- Civil Procedure Rules (26)
- Appellate Jurisdiction Act (7)
- Law of Succession Act (7)
- Probate and Administration Rules (6)
- Evidence Act (6)
- Civil Procedure Act (CPA) (6)
- Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) (6)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Second Appeal (30), Appeal from a High Court ruling (10), Application for stay of execution in an intended appeal (10)
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 37/262, Appeal allowed: 28/262, Dismissed: 11/262, Appeal dismissed with costs: 10/262
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 82/189, Appeal allowed: 18/189, Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed: 9/189, Affirmed: 4/189
- [Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 14/140, Dismissed: 14/140, Appeal allowed: 9/140, The application is granted.: 9/140
- [civil] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 6/19, dismissed: 2/19, Affirmed: 1/19, the appeal is struck out as incompetent: 1/19
- [Civil Application] outcomes — Dismissed: 6/30, Appeal dismissed: 4/30, Application dismissed: 2/30, The application is granted.: 2/30
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~7805 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Stay of execution (3)
- Injunction (3)
- Costs of the application will be costs in the intended appeal (3)
- Set aside ex-parte judgment (2)
- The appellant will have costs of this appeal as against the first respondent (the plaintiff). (2)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.3
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (60), Criminal Procedure Code (30), Civil Procedure Rules (25), Civil Procedure Act (15), Court of Appeal Rules (7)
Sample decisions
Captain Patrick Kanyagia & another v Damaris Wangechi & 2 others [1995] KECA 100 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1995] KECA 100 (KLR) · 11 August 1995
Simon Kamau Kiige v Republic [1995] KECA 102 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1995] KECA 102 (KLR)
Simon Kamau Kiige v Republic [1995] KECA 114 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1995] KECA 114 (KLR)
Nimrod N. Nchogu & another v M.S. Chodha & Sons Limited [1995] KECA 115 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1995] KECA 115 (KLR)
Abdi Noor v Republic [1995] KECA 116 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1995] KECA 116 (KLR) · 21 February 1995
Fred Waweru Kirimo v Republic [1995] KECA 118 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1995] KECA 118 (KLR)
Nimrod N. Nchogu & Another v M. S. Chodha & Sons Limited [1995] KECA 121 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1995] KECA 121 (KLR) · 24 March 1995
Girbux Singh Suri & another v Royal Credit Limited [1995] KECA 123 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1995] KECA 123 (KLR)
Kenya Co-Operative Creameries Ltd v Davies E. Mwai [1995] KECA 129 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1995] KECA 129 (KLR) · 5 June 1995
M'rukaria M’Raria & 139 others v Mwichuiri Farmers Company Limited [1995] KECA 130 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1995] KECA 130 (KLR) · 27 October 1995