Cockar A Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 2 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1991 to 1991; busiest year 1991 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (1)
- Civil Appeal: Application dismissed. (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Penal Code (cap 63) section 320 (1)
- Criminal Procedure Code (cap 75) sections 177, 178(7), 219 (1)
- Registered Land Act (cap 300) section 143(1) (1)
- Civil Procedure Rules (cap 21 Sub Leg) Order XVI Rule 6; Order XLII Rule 1(2) (1)
- Civil Procedure Act (cap 21) Sections 3A, 75(1) (1)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Remedy patterns
- No order as to costs. (1)
Sample decisions
Okhwatenge v Republic [1991] KECA 2 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1991] KECA 2 (KLR) · 13 March 1991
Bandali t/a Shimoni Enterprises v Wills [1991] KECA 8 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1991] KECA 8 (KLR) · 29 August 1991