Brettah Muthuri Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 3 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2017 to 2019; busiest year 2017 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Patent Appeal: Appeal dismissed (1)
- Industrial Design: Application granted (1)
- Industrial Design Dispute: The application for adjournment is dismissed. (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Industrial Property Act 2001 (2)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the rejection of a patent application (1), Application for extension of time to institute revocation/invalidation proceedings (1), Respondents applied for adjournment due to personal matters, which was opposed by the applicant. (1)
- [Patent Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 1/1
- [Industrial Design] outcomes — Application granted: 1/1
- [Industrial Design Dispute] outcomes — The application for adjournment is dismissed.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~10518 words
- Includes panel decisions
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.0
- Frequently applied statutes: Industrial Property Act 2001 (2)
Sample decisions
British American Tobacco (Germany) v Managing Director, KIPI (Tribunal Appeal 20 of 2015) [2017] KEIPT 1 (KLR) (13 April 2017) (Judgment)
KEIPT · [2017] KEIPT 1 (KLR) · 13 April 2017
City Clock (Kenya) Ltd v Mutemi & another (Tribunal Case 72 of 2016) [2017] KEIPT 2 (KLR) (Civ) (13 July 2017) (Ruling)
KEIPT · [2017] KEIPT 2 (KLR) · 13 July 2017
City Clock (Kenya) LTD v Paul Muimi Mutemi & another [2019] KEIPT 26 (KLR)
KEIPT · [2019] KEIPT 26 (KLR) · 12 September 2019