Onyango-Otieno Onyango-Otieno Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 181 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1998 to 2026; busiest year 2007 (136 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (178); Appeal allowed (17); Appeals dismissed (11); Affirmed (10)
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (59); Appeal allowed (22); Application dismissed (14); Affirmed (11)
- Appeal: Appeal dismissed (28); Application dismissed (11); Appeal allowed (10); Dismissed (10)
- civil: Appeal dismissed (16); Appeal allowed (8)
- Civil: Application dismissed (13); Appeal dismissed (6); Dismissed (5); Dismissed with costs (5)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Penal Code (138)
- Criminal Procedure Code (85)
- Civil Procedure Act (50)
- Civil Procedure Rules (42)
- Evidence Act (18)
- Constitution of Kenya (18)
- Court of Appeal Rules (15)
- Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 (14)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the original trial outcome (10), Appeal from conviction and sentence (9), Appeal from original conviction and sentence (8)
- [Arbitration] outcomes — Dismissed: 1/1
- [Civil] outcomes — Application dismissed: 5/41, Dismissed: 4/41, Appeal dismissed: 3/41, Appeal Dismissed: 1/41
- [Civil Suit] outcomes — The two applications are dismissed, and the signed and dated plaint is valid.: 1/20, Dismissed with costs: 1/20, The application is allowed, and the Plaintiff is ordered to pay costs from 26 September 2001 to 11 February 2002.: 1/20, The application is dismissed: 1/20
- [CIVIL] outcomes — Judgment for the plaintiffs: 1/1
- [Application for Order to Cancel Warrant and Discharge Committal] outcomes — Application dismissed: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~23316 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Stay of proceedings (3)
- Injunction (2)
- Stay of proceedings pending appeal (2)
- Remedy for the plaintiffs (1)
- Interest at the rate of 21% per annum from 14th July 1999 until payment in full (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.4
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (21), Civil Procedure Act (18), Civil Procedure Rules (15), Criminal Procedure Code (8), Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (5)
Sample decisions
UAP PROVINCIAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD vs JOSEPH MURIUKI KENYATTI & ANOTHER [1998] KEHC 229 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1998] KEHC 229 (KLR)
ROYAL CREDIT LIMITED v CITY FINANCE LIMITED [1999] KEHC 22 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1999] KEHC 22 (KLR) · 24 June 1999
ROYAL CREDIT LIMITED v CITY FINANCE LIMITED [1999] KEHC 73 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1999] KEHC 73 (KLR) · 24 June 1999
MASEFIED TRADING KENYA LTD v HUNKAR TRADING COMPANY LTD [2000] KEHC 345 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2000] KEHC 345 (KLR) · 30 October 2000
Investment and Mortgages Bank Ltd v Nakumatt Investments Limited & 2 others [2000] KEHC 455 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2000] KEHC 455 (KLR)
Time Magazine International Limited & another v
Michael Fanuel Rotich & another [2000] KEHC 523 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2000] KEHC 523 (KLR)
Trust Bank Limited v H.S.Amin & Company Ltd & another [2000] KEHC 549 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2000] KEHC 549 (KLR)
NDEGWA KABOGO v CO-OPERATIVE MERCHANT BANK LTD & ANOTHER [2001] KEHC 10 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 10 (KLR) · 20 December 2001
TRISHUL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD v NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND [2001] KEHC 20 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 20 (KLR)
JOHN KARARI GITHINJI T/A LIMPOPO SNACKS v KENYA COMMERCIAL FINANCE CO. LTD [2001] KEHC 29 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 29 (KLR)