Jane Dwasi Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 2 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2005 to 2006; busiest year 2006 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Appeal: Appeal dismissed (3)
- Environmental Impact Assessment Appeal: Appeal successful, NEMA's approval set aside (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Environmental Management and Coordination Act, 1999 (2)
- Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) No. 8 of 1999 (1)
- Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations 2003 (1)
- Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) No. 8, 1999 (1)
- Legal Notice No. 101 of 2003 (1)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Remedy patterns
- The 1st Respondent is directed to issue an EIA license to Great Properties Limited (1)
Sample decisions
NAKUMATT HOLDINGS LIMITED v NATIONAL ENVIROMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY & another [2005] KEHC 18 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2005] KEHC 18 (KLR) · 12 August 2005
NAROK COUNTY COUNCIL & another v NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTMANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (NEMA) & another [2006] KEHC 39 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2006] KEHC 39 (KLR) · 20 December 2006