Melissa Ng'Ania Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 9 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2020 to 2022; busiest year 2020 (6 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil: Affirmed (1); The Tribunal found in favor of the Claimant. (1); The Respondent is ordered to pay damages and other remedies (1); The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay damages and other (1)
- HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act: The cause is dismissed with no orders as to costs (1)
- HIV and AIDS Tribunal: In favor of the Claimant (1)
- HIV & AIDS Discrimination Case: The Respondent was ordered to pay damages for the impairment (1)
- Tribunal: The Respondent is ordered to pay damages and other reliefs t (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, 2006 (4)
- HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, Cap 246A (1)
- HIV & AIDS Prevention and Control Act, 2006 (1)
- HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act 2011 (HAPCA) (1)
- HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the original trial (2), Appeal from an original trial judgment (1), Claimant's case dismissed without hearing Respondent's submissions (1)
- [Civil] outcomes — Affirmed: 1/4, The Tribunal found in favor of the Claimant.: 1/4, The Respondent is ordered to pay damages and other remedies to the Claimant.: 1/4, The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay damages and other remedies to the Claimant.: 1/4
- [HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act] outcomes — The cause is dismissed with no orders as to costs: 1/1
- [HIV and AIDS Tribunal] outcomes — In favor of the Claimant: 1/1
- [HIV & AIDS Discrimination Case] outcomes — The Respondent was ordered to pay damages for the impairment of dignity, emotional, physical and psychological suffering.: 1/1
- [Tribunal] outcomes — The Respondent is ordered to pay damages and other reliefs to the Claimant.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~26083 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Declaration of disclosure (1)
- General damages (1)
- Damages for testing the Claimant without her consent (1)
- Damages for testing the Claimant without pre-test or post-test counselling (1)
- Damages for the breach of confidentiality, unlawful disclosure, impairment of dignity, emotional and psychological suffering (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.2
- Frequently applied statutes: HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, 2006 (4), HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, Cap 246A (1), HIV & AIDS Prevention and Control Act, 2006 (1), HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act 2011 (HAPCA) (1), HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act (1)
Sample decisions
EOD v OC & another [2020] KEHAT 110 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 110 (KLR) · 4 May 2020
SM v ENA [2020] KEHAT 145 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 145 (KLR)
M.A.O v S. M & another [2020] KEHAT 17 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 17 (KLR) · 26 May 2020
RAO v MGH & 2 others [2020] KEHAT 39 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 39 (KLR) · 27 November 2020
JK v AAR Healthcare Kenya Ltd [2020] KEHAT 40 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 40 (KLR) · 6 November 2020
J K v AAR Healthcare Kenya Ltd [2020] KEHAT 44 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 44 (KLR)
GGOO v MOA [2021] KEHAT 624 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2021] KEHAT 624 (KLR)
BAO v China Henan International Co-operation Group Co. Ltd [2021] KEHAT 86 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2021] KEHAT 86 (KLR) · 3 December 2021
G. O v Norbert Odhiambo & another [2022] KEHAT 104 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2022] KEHAT 104 (KLR)