Asike–Makhandia Asike–Makhandia Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 10 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2012 to 2025; busiest year 2012 (10 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal allowed, conviction quashed, sentence set aside (4); The appellant is set at liberty. (1); Appeal successful, sentence commuted to the period already s (1); Appeal dismissed (1)
- Civil Application: Application dismissed (1)
- Civil Appeal: Appeal allowed, High Court's judgment set aside (1); Appeal dismissed with costs (1); Affirmed (1)
- Revision: The order of the Chief Magistrate's Court is vacated. (1)
- Appeal: Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed (1); Appeal successful, sentence commuted to 7 years already serv (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Sexual Offences Act (3)
- Court of Appeal Rules (1)
- Penalty section (1)
- Penal Code (1)
- Criminal Procedure Code (1)
- Dismas Wafula Kilwake v Republic (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from conviction and sentence (4), Appeal on sentence only (1), Appeal from a decision of the Chief Magistrate's Court (1)
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal allowed, conviction quashed, sentence set aside: 4/6, The appellant is set at liberty.: 1/6, Appeal successful, sentence commuted to the period already served.: 1/6
- [Revision] outcomes — The order of the Chief Magistrate's Court is vacated.: 1/1
- [Appeal] outcomes — Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed: 1/2, Appeal successful, sentence commuted to 7 years already served.: 1/2
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed with costs: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~7620 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- The case will be heard by another court of competent jurisdiction (1)
- Set the appellant at liberty (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.1
- Frequently applied statutes: Sexual Offences Act (2), Penal Code (1), Criminal Procedure Code (1), Penalty section (1)
Sample decisions
EDWARD BARASA v REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1528 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1528 (KLR) · 28 September 2012
JOSEPH MWANIA NGOLYA V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1567 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1567 (KLR) · 1 September 2012
D.W. V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1569 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1569 (KLR) · 28 September 2012
JOHN MBULU KAVIU V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 2611 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 2611 (KLR) · 30 July 2012
A M M v REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 2640 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 2640 (KLR) · 30 July 2012
ISAACK MWINJI V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 2677 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 2677 (KLR) · 30 July 2012
MUTUA KILUNDU v REPUBLIC (Criminal Appeal 49 of 2006) [2012] KEHC 2774 (KLR) (30 July 2012) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 2774 (KLR) · 30 July 2012
PATRICK NZIVO KIIO V REPUBLIC (Criminal Appeal 96 of 2009) [2012] KEHC 2785 (KLR) (30 July 2012) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 2785 (KLR) · 30 July 2012
ATHI RIVER STEEL PLANT LIMITED v PETER ODHIAMBO MUKOK [2012] KEHC 4049 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 4049 (KLR) · 19 March 2012
DENNIS MUASYA MUTUMA V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 5714 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 5714 (KLR) · 30 July 2012