Azangalala Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 977 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2005 to 2026; busiest year 2017 (15 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (6); Appeal successful (3); Affirmed (3); The appeal was dismissed. (2)
- Civil: Appeal dismissed (4); The application was dismissed. (3); Application dismissed (2); Dismissed (2)
- civil: Appeal dismissed (3)
- Miscellaneous Application: The application is dismissed. (2); The preliminary objection is allowed, and the Bill of Costs (1)
- Civil Suit: Appeal dismissed (2); The court ordered the refund of equivalent of USD 4,751,480. (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (27)
- Civil Procedure Rules (18)
- Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (8)
- Advocates Act (4)
- Law of Succession Act (4)
- Constitution of Kenya (3)
- Registered Land Act (3)
- Companies Act (3)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from conviction and sentence (54), Appeal from the original trial outcome (33), Appeal from a previous judgment (17)
- [Civil Suit] outcomes — Application dismissed: 13/90, Appeal dismissed: 8/90, Application dismissed with costs: 4/90, Granted: 4/90
- [Civil] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 36/249, Application dismissed: 27/249, Granted: 14/249, Application dismissed with costs: 9/249
- [Costs Reference] outcomes — Appeal allowed, decision of the Taxing Officer set aside: 1/3, Reference allowed, bill of costs remitted: 1/3, Affirmed: 1/3
- [Application] outcomes — Granted: 2/3, Application dismissed: 1/3
- [Miscellaneous Civil Application] outcomes — Application denied: 2/23, The application is dismissed: 2/23, Application dismissed: 2/23, Dismissed with costs: 2/23
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~9161 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Set the appellant at liberty (5)
- Injunction (4)
- Damages (3)
- Damages for breach of contract (3)
- Interlocutory injunction (3)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.3
- Frequently applied statutes: Civil Procedure Act (117), Civil Procedure Rules (107), Penal Code (44), Criminal Procedure Code (18), Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 (17)
Sample decisions
Anthony Athanas Ngotho T/A Ngotho Architects [2004] KEHC 1535 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1535 (KLR) · 18 March 2004
Elias Ngungi Nganga v Charity Waithira Marine & 3 others [2004] KEHC 1558 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1558 (KLR) · 30 June 2004
Redhill Holdings Ltd v Heritage A.I.I,Insurance & 2 others [2004] KEHC 1588 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1588 (KLR) · 28 January 2004
FEISAL SHARIFF MOHAMMED vs DUBAI BANK KENYA LIMITED [2004] KEHC 1632 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1632 (KLR)
KIPKORIR TITOO & KIARA ADVOCATE v AFRICAN BANKING CORPORATION LTD [2004] KEHC 1649 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1649 (KLR) · 10 December 2004
CENTRAL BANK OF KENYA v KAMAL Z. SHAH & ANOTHER [2004] KEHC 179 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 179 (KLR) · 10 December 2004
KIBET & CO. ADVOCATES v IBRAHIM S. AHMED & ANOTHER [2004] KEHC 180 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 180 (KLR) · 6 December 2004
WILLIE JOHN MWANGI vs THE CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF KENYA LTD [2004] KEHC 1909 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1909 (KLR)
ST. MARY SCHOOL, NAIROBI vs JOSEPHAT GITONGA KABUGI [2004] KEHC 1918 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1918 (KLR)
THE KENYA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD vs THE CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF KENYA LTD [2004] KEHC 1955 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1955 (KLR)