Mustill Mustill Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 4 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2015 to 2023; busiest year 2021 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Commercial Arbitration: The application dated 4th July 2023 is not res judicata. (1); Application dismissed (1)
- Land Dispute: The application for a mandatory injunction at interlocutory (1)
- Injunction Application: The Notice of Motion application is allowed entirely with co (1)
- Employment Dispute: The application for a temporary injunction and stay of suspe (1)
- Arbitration: The court determined the legal implications of the bifurcati (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Arbitration Act (2)
- Civil Procedure Act, 2010 (1)
- Civil Procedure Rules 2010 (1)
- Arbitration Act, 1995 (1)
- Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act Cap 387 (1)
- National Construction Authority Act (1)
- Civil Procedure Rules (1)
- Arbitration Act 1995 (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Application for removal of arbitrator and challenge of jurisdiction (1), Application to Set Aside Arbitration Award (1), Application for removal of arbitrator (1)
- [Arbitration] outcomes — The court determined the legal implications of the bifurcation of the application and held that the arbitrator is entitled to appear and be heard before the High Court.: 1/1
- [Arbitration Dispute] outcomes — The court set aside the arbitral award and the decree, and ordered the stay of execution of the award.: 1/1
- [Commercial Arbitration] outcomes — Application dismissed: 1/2, The application dated 4th July 2023 is not res judicata.: 1/2
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~36180 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Stay of execution of the arbitral award (1)
- Extension of time to set aside the arbitral award (1)
- Set aside the judgment and decree (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.5
- Frequently applied statutes: Arbitration Act (2), Civil Procedure Rules (1), Arbitration Act 1995 (1), Civil Procedure Act, 2010 (1), Civil Procedure Rules 2010 (1)
Sample decisions
Chania Gardens Limited v Gilbi Construction Company Limited & another [2015] KEHC 6202 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 6202 (KLR) · 5 March 2015
Murithiwanjao (T/A Wanjao&Wanjau; Advocates) v Samuel Mundati Gatabaki & another [2015] KEHC 8224 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 8224 (KLR) · 4 June 2015
West Park Limited v Villa Care Limited & another [2020] KEHC 10006 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 10006 (KLR)
Zakhem International Construction Limited & another v Oilfields Engineering and Supplies Limited & another; Kenya Pipeline Company Ltd (Intended Interested Party) (Commercial Arbitration Cause E042 & E036 of 2021 (Consolidated)) [2023] KEHC 21842 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (31 August 2023) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2023] KEHC 21842 (KLR) · 31 August 2023