See Farwell Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 2 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1984 to 2017; busiest year 2017 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: The application for stay of execution pending appeal was gra (2); Judgment for specific performance with costs awarded to the (1); Affirmed the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's appli (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Companies Act (2)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order XII Rule 6 (1)
- Civil Procedure Rules (1)
- Transfer of Property Act (1)
- Court's Rules (1)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Remedy patterns
- Judgment for specific performance with costs awarded to the appellants. (1)
Sample decisions
Choitram & another v Nazari (Civil Appeal 8 of 1982) [1984] KECA 116 (KLR) (20 January 1984) (Judgment)
Court of Appeal · [1984] KECA 116 (KLR) · 20 January 1984
Choitram & another v Nazari (Civil Appeal 8 of 1982) [1984] KECA 47 (KLR) (20 January 1984) (Judgment)
Court of Appeal · [1984] KECA 47 (KLR) · 20 January 1984