Paul Kosgei Beta

Main subject areas

Activity

Published decisions from 2011 to 2019; busiest year 2015 (2 decisions).

Documented outcomes by case type

• Civil: Claimant wins (1)
• Industrial Court Review Application: The Claimant's application for review is successful, but onl (1)
• Industrial Court: The claimant's claim is struck out. (1); Settled (1)
• Contempt of Court: Dismissed with no order as to costs (1)
• Industrial Dispute: Court has jurisdiction to hear the case and will proceed. (1)

Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.

Most-cited legislation

• Employment Act 2007 (1)
• ILO Convention No 158 (1)
• Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 (1)
• Industrial Court Act 2011 (1)
• Hamburg's Laws of England (4th Edi.1 Vol.9P. 3 of 61 (1)
• Civil Application No. NAI 265 of 1993 (1)
• Civil Appeal No. 95 of 1988 (1)
• Industrial Court Act of 2011 (1)

Documented reasoning patterns

• Most common procedural postures: Claimant's Application for Review of Award (1), Appeal from a consent order (1), Appeal from an original trial judgment (1)
• [Industrial Court Review Application] outcomes — The Claimant's application for review is successful, but only to the extent that the Claimant is paid two days' salary for March 2010 in addition to the payments ordered in the award.: 1/1
• [Industrial Court] outcomes — Settled: 1/1
• [Contempt of Court] outcomes — Dismissed with no order as to costs: 1/1

Writing characteristics

• Median judgment length ~11215 words
• Includes panel decisions

Remedy patterns

• Payment of two days' salary for March 2010 (1)
• Settlement of the matter (1)
• Each party bears its own costs (1)
• Claimants have no claims against the respondent, its officers or shareholders (1)
• Orders of 30th June 2010 and 10th October 2011 are set aside (1)

Citation patterns

• Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.3
• Frequently applied statutes: Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 (1), Industrial Court Act 2011 (1), Hamburg's Laws of England (4th Edi.1 Vol.9P. 3 of 61 (1), Civil Application No. NAI 265 of 1993 (1), Civil Appeal No. 95 of 1988 (1)