Similarly Ringera Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 5 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2022 to 2023; busiest year 2023 (4 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Miscellaneous Civil Application: Reference dismissed with costs to the Applicant (1); The court allows the reference and sets aside the taxing off (1); The applicant’s reference is found to be merited. (1)
- Costs Appeal: Allowing the reference and setting aside the taxing officer' (1)
- Costs Reference: The applicant's reference is successful in respect of items (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Advocates Remuneration Order 2006, 2009 & 2014 (3)
- Advocates Remuneration Order 2014 (2)
- Civil Procedure Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Applicant seeks to set aside the decision of the taxing officer and refer the items for fresh taxation (1), Respondent opposed, Applicant sought to set aside taxing officer's decision on bill of costs (1), Applicant seeks to set aside the bill of costs taxed by the taxing officer and request a fresh tax (1)
- [Costs Reference] outcomes — The applicant's reference is successful in respect of items 54 and 80, and the court awards costs to the 1st respondent: 1/1
- [Miscellaneous Civil Application] outcomes — Reference dismissed with costs to the Applicant: 1/3, The court allows the reference and sets aside the taxing officer's decision: 1/3, The applicant’s reference is found to be merited.: 1/3
- [Costs Appeal] outcomes — Allowing the reference and setting aside the taxing officer's decision: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~20251 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Costs awarded to the 1st respondent (1)
- Allowance of the chamber summons with costs (1)
- The taxing officer's decision is set aside (1)
- Allowance of the reference and setting aside the taxing officer's decision (1)
- The costs of the reference are awarded to the applicant (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 5.0
- Frequently applied statutes: Advocates Remuneration Order 2006, 2009 & 2014 (3), Advocates Remuneration Order 2014 (2), Civil Procedure Act (1)
Sample decisions
Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited v Nzilia & 3 others (Miscellaneous Civil Application E346 & E060 of 2020 & E059 of 2021 (Consolidated)) [2022] KEHC 16444 (KLR) (Civ) (8 December 2022) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2022] KEHC 16444 (KLR) · 8 December 2022
Makau v UAP Insurance Co. Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Application E210 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 18185 (KLR) (Civ) (25 May 2023) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2023] KEHC 18185 (KLR) · 25 May 2023
Mbai Waweru Advocates v Invesco Assurance Co Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application E194 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 2030 (KLR) (Civ) (9 March 2023) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2023] KEHC 2030 (KLR) · 9 March 2023
Mbai Waweru Advocates v Invesco Assurance Co Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application E197 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 2031 (KLR) (Civ) (9 March 2023) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2023] KEHC 2031 (KLR) · 9 March 2023
Mbai Waweru Advocates v Invesco Assurance Co Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application E192 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 3736 (KLR) (Civ) (20 April 2023) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2023] KEHC 3736 (KLR) · 20 April 2023