Onyancha Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 859 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2001 to 2026; busiest year 2016 (21 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (10); Affirmed (6); The appeal was dismissed. (2); The application is allowed in part, with the substitution of (1)
- Civil: Appeal dismissed (5); The application is allowed. (2); Application dismissed (2)
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (4); Appeal successful, death sentence reinstated (1)
- civil: Appeal dismissed (4)
- Election Petition: The petition is struck out. (2); The Petition is struck out. (2)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (24)
- Civil Procedure Rules (19)
- Law of Succession Act (9)
- Cap 160, Laws of Kenya (8)
- Law Reform Act (6)
- Arbitration Act, 1995 (5)
- Arbitration Act (5)
- Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (4)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from conviction and sentence (63), Appeal from original conviction and sentence (33), Appeal from the original trial outcome (29)
- [Divorce] outcomes — The marriage is dissolved.: 4/22, Dissolution of marriage: 2/22, Granted: 2/22, Decree nisi issued, custody awarded to Petitioner: 1/22
- [Miscellaneous Civil Application] outcomes — Application dismissed: 3/19, Application dismissed with costs: 3/19, The application is granted.: 1/19, Application struck out: 1/19
- [Miscellaneous Application] outcomes — Application dismissed: 4/21, Leave to appeal granted: 1/21, The application is struck out as incompetent.: 1/21, The main application was dismissed and the preliminary objections were upheld.: 1/21
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 34/184, Appeal allowed: 17/184, Appeal successful, conviction and sentence quashed: 12/184, Appeal successful: 11/184
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 56/203, Appeal allowed: 14/203, Appeal dismissed with costs: 12/203, Dismissed with costs: 7/203
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~9061 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Order for retrial (4)
- Quashing of conviction and sentence (4)
- Injunction (4)
- Set the appellant at liberty (3)
- Damages (3)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.2
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (71), Criminal Procedure Code (24), Civil Procedure Act (23), Civil Procedure Rules (23), Section 296(2) of the Penal Code (5)
Sample decisions
L W M v K D M [2000] KEHC 212 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2000] KEHC 212 (KLR) · 6 February 2000
MOHAMED ABU ALI vs KENYA POWER & LIGHTING CO. LTD [2000] KEHC 98 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2000] KEHC 98 (KLR) · 21 March 2000
UBA KASSIM NASSOR vs SULEIMAN ELIANGI RINGA [2001] KEHC 125 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 125 (KLR)
KAINGU KARISA KAPHINGO vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 263 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 263 (KLR) · 16 November 2001
KIVENZI NZAU KITILI vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 268 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 268 (KLR) · 19 November 2001
JAMES KINYWA NKOROI vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 273 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 273 (KLR) · 6 December 2001
SAMUEL NGATI MAINA vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 277 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 277 (KLR)
MOSES UPEPO SHILENGE vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 282 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 282 (KLR) · 19 November 2001
ROY MWITI vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 308 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 308 (KLR) · 22 November 2001
DEMETRAS MWASI vs REPUBLIC [2001] KEHC 337 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 337 (KLR) · 27 November 2001