Molo Molo Beta

Main subject areas

Activity

Published decisions from 1991 to 2017; busiest year 2017 (6 decisions).

Documented outcomes by case type

• Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (3); Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed (1); Appeal successful, conviction and sentence for rape and inde (1); The appellant is set at liberty. (1)
• Costs Dispute: Application dismissed (1)

Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.

Most-cited legislation

• Penal Code (2)
• Criminal Procedure Code (2)
• Law Reform Act (cap 26) (1)
• Fatal Accidents Act (cap 32) (1)
• Advocates (Remuneration) Order (cap 16 Sub Leg) rule 11(2) (1)
• Sexual Offences Act, 2006 (1)
• Sexual Offences Act 2006 (1)

Documented reasoning patterns

• Most common procedural postures: Appeal from a conviction and sentence by the Chief Magistrate's Court (2), Appeal from a decision of the Taxing Officer (1), Appeal from conviction and sentence (1)
• [Costs Dispute] outcomes — Application dismissed: 1/1
• [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 3/6, Appeal successful, conviction and sentence for rape and indecent assault quashed.: 1/6, The appellant is set at liberty.: 1/6, Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed: 1/6

Writing characteristics

• Median judgment length ~10028 words
• Includes panel decisions

Remedy patterns

• Set the appellant at liberty (2)

Citation patterns

• Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.9
• Frequently applied statutes: Criminal Procedure Code (2), Penal Code (2), Law Reform Act (cap 26) (1), Fatal Accidents Act (cap 32) (1), Advocates (Remuneration) Order (cap 16 Sub Leg) rule 11(2) (1)