See Nyamu Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 2 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2013 to 2024; busiest year 2024 (1 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Judicial Review: The application is allowed. (1); The court granted the ex parte applicant's application. (1); Leave to amend granted (1)
- Commercial & Admiralty: The application to discharge the ex parte injunction is allo (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (1)
- Order 53 Rule 4 (1)
- Civil Procedure Rules (1)
- Customs and Excise Act, Chapter 472 of the Laws of Kenya (Repealed) (1)
- East African Community Customs Management Act, 2004 (1)
- Companies Act Cap 486 of the Laws of Kenya (1)
- Land Registration Act (1)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Remedy patterns
- Quash the decision of KRA to recover the demand (1)
- Compel KRA to process and pay the VAT refunds (1)
Sample decisions
Caroline Wanjiru Wanjihia & another v I & M Bank [2014] KEHC 1794 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2014] KEHC 1794 (KLR) · 12 November 2014
Republic v Kenya Revenue Authority Ex-Parte: Cosmos Limited [2016] KEHC 4712 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2016] KEHC 4712 (KLR) · 10 June 2016