Gachuhi Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 215 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1985 to 2026; busiest year 1987 (26 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (16); Appeal allowed (7); Appeal successful (3); Application dismissed (3)
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (12); Appeal allowed (4); Appeals dismissed (2); Appeal allowed, conviction quashed (2)
- Appeal: Appeal dismissed (9); Appeal allowed (2)
- Civil: Judgment for the plaintiff (3)
- civil: Appeal dismissed (2)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (16)
- Civil Procedure Rules (15)
- Criminal Procedure Code (13)
- Penal Code (9)
- Evidence Act (4)
- Traffic Act (3)
- Law Reform Act (3)
- Limitation of Actions Act (2)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from a judgment of the High Court (10), Second Appeal (7), Appeal from a High Court judgment (6)
- [Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 3/8, The time within which to file the notice of appeal is extended to April 30, 1986.: 1/8, The notice of appeal is struck out with costs to the respondent.: 1/8, Dismissed: 1/8
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 30/102, Appeal allowed: 10/102, Appeal dismissed with costs: 7/102, Appeal successful: 4/102
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 32/79, Appeal allowed, conviction quashed, sentence set aside: 5/79, Appeal allowed: 4/79, Appeals dismissed: 4/79
- [Personal Injury] outcomes — Affirmed with reduction in award: 1/4, The appeal is allowed in part.: 1/4, Appeal allowed: 1/4, Affirmed: 1/4
- [Land Dispute] outcomes — Appeal dismissed, cross-appeal allowed: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~13396 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- The costs of the application will go to Esso Standard Kenya Ltd. (1)
- Set appellant at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held (1)
- Sentences reduced (1)
- Fifteen strokes of corporal punishment imposed (1)
- Costs to the applicant (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.6
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (18), Criminal Procedure Code (11), Civil Procedure Rules (7), Civil Procedure Act (6), Appellate Jurisdiction Act (3)
Sample decisions
MURIITHI KIRII vs NGARI KIRII [1985] KECA 1 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1985] KECA 1 (KLR)
ESSO STANDARD KENYA LTD vs ONESMUS KIHARA MWANGI [1985] KECA 134 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1985] KECA 134 (KLR) · 6 May 1985
Justus Odomo Munyole v Republic [1985] KECA 34 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1985] KECA 34 (KLR) · 5 December 1985
Samuel Awiti Karani v Republic [1985] KECA 44 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1985] KECA 44 (KLR)
Nguku v Republic [1985] KECA 45 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1985] KECA 45 (KLR) · 25 June 1985
Southern Engineering Company Ltd v Mutia [1985] KECA 49 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1985] KECA 49 (KLR)
Benson Ngunyi Ndungu v Republic [1985] KECA 51 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1985] KECA 51 (KLR) · 15 November 1985
Peter Ochieng v Republic [1985] KECA 52 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1985] KECA 52 (KLR) · 9 August 1985
Joseph Kariuki v Republic [1985] KECA 53 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1985] KECA 53 (KLR)
Mutitika v Baharini Farm Ltd [1985] KECA 60 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1985] KECA 60 (KLR) · 10 July 1985