Ro Kwach Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 4 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the judgment of High Court at Kisumu (1), Application for injunction pending appeal (1), Appeal from the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Kenya (1)
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — The conviction was quashed, and the appellant was ordered to be released.: 1/2, Appeal dismissed: 1/2
- [Appeal] outcomes — The applicants' application for injunction is allowed.: 1/1
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~10580 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Injunction (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.5
- Frequently applied statutes: Kenya Posts and Telecommunications Corporation Act (1), Kenya Posts and Telecommunications Corporation (Pensions) Regulations, 1985 (1)
Sample decisions
Wamunga v Republic (Criminal Appeal 20 of 1989) [1989] KECA 47 (KLR) (22 June 1989) (Judgment)
Court of Appeal · [1989] KECA 47 (KLR) · 22 June 1989
NYAMODI OCHIENG-NYAMOGO & another v KENYA POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION [1993] KECA 37 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1993] KECA 37 (KLR) · 8 October 1993
M’IRUANJI MUCHAI v BROADWAYS BAKERY & another [1996] KECA 29 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1996] KECA 29 (KLR) · 16 May 1996
ABDALLAH CHIBINDO NYASI vs REPUBLIC [1998] KECA 77 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1998] KECA 77 (KLR) · 14 July 1998