Kiambu Laban Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 4 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2015 to 2024; busiest year 2024 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Judicial Review: The application is allowed with costs. (1); The court granted the ex parte application for certiorari an (1); The ex parte Applicant is granted an order of mandamus for p (1)
- Land Dispute: Application dismissed with costs (1)
- Judicial Review Miscellaneous Applicatio: The Court allows the application and grants the order of man (1); The court grants the order of mandamus to compel the respond (1); Leave granted (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Government Proceedings Act (5)
- Civil Procedure Rules (2)
- Law Reforms Act (2)
- Judicial Review Act (1)
- Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 21 Laws of Kenya (1)
- Physical Planning Act (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Ex parte application for certiorari and prohibition (1), Ex parte application for leave to apply for mandamus (1), Ex parte application for mandamus (1)
- [Judicial Review] outcomes — The court granted the ex parte application for certiorari and prohibition, quashing the Planning Enforcement Notice and prohibiting the county from stopping the applicant's development.: 1/3, The ex parte Applicant is granted an order of mandamus for payment of Kshs 248,445.00 in certified costs and interest.: 1/3, The application is allowed with costs.: 1/3
- [Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application] outcomes — Leave granted: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~21194 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Quashing the Planning Enforcement Notice (1)
- Prohibiting the county from stopping the applicant's development (1)
- Order for mandamus against the county government (1)
- Payment of Kshs 248,445.00 in certified costs and interest at 6% per annum from 28th September 2017 until payment in full. (1)
- Costs of the Notice of Motion dated 14th August 2020 of Kshs 30,000/. (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.8
- Frequently applied statutes: Government Proceedings Act (3), Physical Planning Act (1), Civil Procedure Rules (1), Judicial Review Act (1)
Sample decisions
Republic v County Government of Kiambu Exparte Laban J Macharia Muiruri [2015] KEHC 7920 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 7920 (KLR) · 1 December 2015
Republic v County Government of Kiambu Ex Parte;Laban J. Macharia Muiruri (Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application 14 of 2020) [2020] KEHC 3364 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (27 July 2020) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 3364 (KLR) · 27 July 2020
Republic v County Government of Kiambu Ex Parte Laban J Macharia Muiruri [2021] KEHC 1073 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2021] KEHC 1073 (KLR) · 25 November 2021
Republic v County Government of Nairobi; KCB Bank Limited (Exparte) (Judicial Review Application E077 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 22611 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (21 September 2023) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [2023] KEHC 22611 (KLR) · 21 September 2023