Hayne Hayne Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 6 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2017 to 2020; busiest year 2017 (3 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Judicial Review: The application for judicial review was dismissed. (1); Dismissed with costs (1); In favor of the ex parte applicant, Omikko Electronics Kenya (1); Affirmed (1)
- Petition for Access to Information: The court upheld the respondents' refusal to grant access to (1)
- Access to Information: The court affirmed the right of access to information as ens (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Fair Administrative Action Act, 2015 (2)
- Constitution of Kenya (2)
- Access to Information Act (2)
- Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, 2015 (1)
- Law Reform Act, Chapter 26 (1)
- Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (1)
- Article 35 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 (1)
- Access to Information Act No. 31 of 2016 (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from a refusal to grant access to information (1), Petition for Access to Information (1), Ex parte application for leave to apply for judicial review orders (1)
- [Petition for Access to Information] outcomes — The court upheld the respondents' refusal to grant access to the information, finding that the refusal was justified under Section 6 of the Act.: 1/1
- [Access to Information] outcomes — The court affirmed the right of access to information as enshrined in Article 35 of the Constitution and the Access to Information Act.: 1/1
- [Judicial Review] outcomes — Dismissed with costs: 1/4, The application for judicial review was dismissed.: 1/4, In favor of the ex parte applicant, Omikko Electronics Kenya Limited: 1/4, Affirmed: 1/4
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~82735 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Mandamus granted (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 3.0
- Frequently applied statutes: Access to Information Act (2), Fair Administrative Action Act, 2015 (2), Constitution of Kenya (2), Article 35 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 (1), Access to Information Act No. 31 of 2016 (1)
Sample decisions
Nyawade v Banking Fraud Investigations Department & 2 others (Petition 143 of 2017) [2017] KEHC 9108 (KLR) (Constitutional and Human Rights) (25 July 2017) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [2017] KEHC 9108 (KLR) · 25 July 2017
Zebedeo John Opore v The Independent Electoral And Boundaries Commission [2017] KEHC 9217 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2017] KEHC 9217 (KLR)
Siemens (Proprietary) Limited v Kenya Pipeline Company Ltd & another [2017] KEHC 9793 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2017] KEHC 9793 (KLR)
Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board; County Government of Laikipia & another (Interested Parties); Pelt Security Services Ltd (Ex parte) (Judicial Review Application 74 of 2018) [2018] KEHC 2068 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (3 December 2018) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [2018] KEHC 2068 (KLR) · 3 December 2018
Republic v Communication Authority of Kenya; Safaricom Limited & 2 others (Interested Parties); Ex Parte Omikko Electronics Kenya [2019] KEHC 11697 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2019] KEHC 11697 (KLR) · 24 September 2019
Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board;Consortium of GBM Projects Limited and ERG Insaat Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.S (interested party) ;National Irrigation Board Ex Parte [2020] KEHC 9232 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 9232 (KLR) · 17 January 2020