Maryanne Ndonga Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 15 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2019 to 2022; busiest year 2020 (7 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil: Affirmed (2); The court finds for the Claimant and orders the Respondent t (1); The Respondents are found to have disclosed the Claimant’s H (1); The Tribunal found in favor of the Claimant. (1)
- Discrimination Case: Denied (1)
- Employment and Labour: Affirmed (1)
- HIV and AIDS: The court found in favor of the Claimant. (1)
- HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act: The cause is dismissed with no orders as to costs (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, 2006 (6)
- HIV & AIDS Prevention and Control Act, 2006 (3)
- Constitution of Kenya (2)
- HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, Cap 246A (1)
- HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act 2011 (HAPCA) (1)
- HIV and AIDS Prevention & Control Act, 2006 (1)
- HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act (1)
- HAPCA (HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act) 2006 (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from the original trial (5), Appeal from an original trial (2), Appeal from the original trial outcome (1)
- [HIV and AIDS] outcomes — The court found in favor of the Claimant.: 1/1
- [Civil] outcomes — Affirmed: 2/8, The court finds for the Claimant and orders the Respondent to pay the Claimant's costs.: 1/8, The Respondents are found to have disclosed the Claimant’s HIV status without her consent and to have caused stigmatization and harassment.: 1/8, The Tribunal found in favor of the Claimant.: 1/8
- [HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act] outcomes — The cause is dismissed with no orders as to costs: 1/1
- [HIV and AIDS Tribunal] outcomes — In favor of the Claimant: 1/1
- [HIV & AIDS Discrimination Case] outcomes — The Respondent was ordered to pay damages for the impairment of dignity, emotional, physical and psychological suffering.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~23969 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- General damages (2)
- Declaration of disclosure (1)
- Damages for testing the Claimant without her consent (1)
- Damages for testing the Claimant without pre-test or post-test counselling (1)
- Damages for the breach of confidentiality, unlawful disclosure, impairment of dignity, emotional and psychological suffering (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.6
- Frequently applied statutes: HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, 2006 (6), HIV & AIDS Prevention and Control Act, 2006 (3), Constitution of Kenya (2), HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, Cap 246A (1), HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act 2011 (HAPCA) (1)
Sample decisions
SNW v AG [2019] KEHAT 20 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2019] KEHAT 20 (KLR)
SNW v Asha Gulam [2019] KEHAT 69 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2019] KEHAT 69 (KLR)
M A O v S M & H M [2020] KEHAT 101 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 101 (KLR) · 26 May 2020
EOD v OC & another [2020] KEHAT 110 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 110 (KLR) · 4 May 2020
SM v ENA [2020] KEHAT 145 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 145 (KLR)
M.A.O v S. M & another [2020] KEHAT 17 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 17 (KLR) · 26 May 2020
RAO v MGH & 2 others [2020] KEHAT 39 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 39 (KLR) · 27 November 2020
JK v AAR Healthcare Kenya Ltd [2020] KEHAT 40 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 40 (KLR) · 6 November 2020
J K v AAR Healthcare Kenya Ltd [2020] KEHAT 44 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2020] KEHAT 44 (KLR)
GGOO v MOA [2021] KEHAT 624 (KLR)
KEHAT · [2021] KEHAT 624 (KLR)