Hassan Hache Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 4 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2024 to 2025; busiest year 2025 (3 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Aviation Dispute: The Complainant's suit was dismissed. (1); The Complainant is awarded KSh. 2,400/= in refund and KSh. 2 (1); The Complainant is awarded Kshs 172,650/= for the purchase p (1)
- Civil: The appeal is dismissed. (1); The Complainant is awarded Ksh. 466,000.00 in refund, intere (1)
- Appeal: The decision of the Respondent to grant the licence to Ishar (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Aviation Act (2)
- Civil Aviation Act No. 21 of 2013 (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Complaint by the Complainant against the Respondent for breach of contract and other related claims (1), Appeal from a decision of the National Civil Aviation Administrative Review Tribunal (1), Appeal from a civil trial (1)
- [Civil Aviation Dispute] outcomes — The Complainant is awarded KSh. 2,400/= in refund and KSh. 20,000/= in legal costs.: 1/2, The Complainant is awarded Kshs 172,650/= for the purchase price of the aborted journey and Kshs 30,000/= in costs.: 1/2
- [Civil] outcomes — The appeal is dismissed.: 1/2, The Complainant is awarded Ksh. 466,000.00 in refund, interest at court rates, and costs.: 1/2
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~12286 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Refund of KSh. 2,400/= to the Complainant (1)
- Award of KSh. 20,000/= in legal costs to the Complainant (1)
- Refund of Ksh. 466,000.00. (1)
- Interest at court rates. (1)
- Costs awarded to the Complainant and the 2nd Respondent, the 1st Third Party, and the 2nd Third Party. (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.2
- Frequently applied statutes: Civil Aviation Act (1)
Sample decisions
Owino v Five Forty Aviation Ltd t/a Fly 540 (Complaint E006 of 2022) [2024] KENCCART 1007 (KLR) (2 April 2024) (Judgment)
KENCCART · [2024] KENCCART 1007 (KLR) · 2 April 2024
Chepkorir v Qatar Airways (Complaint E002 of 2022) [2024] KENCCART 1195 (KLR) (6 August 2024) (Judgment)
KENCCART · [2024] KENCCART 1195 (KLR) · 6 August 2024
JRO (Suing as the Mother and Next Friend of the Minor HC v Skyward Express Limited (Tribunal Case E006 of 2023) [2025] KENCCART 79 (KLR) (Civ) (18 March 2025) (Judgment)
KENCCART · [2025] KENCCART 79 (KLR) · 18 March 2025
Kageche v Kamasky Travel Ltd & another (Complaint E004 of 2024) [2025] KENCCART 80 (KLR) (Civ) (11 March 2025) (Judgment)
KENCCART · [2025] KENCCART 80 (KLR) · 11 March 2025