Muya Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 574 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2013 to 2026; busiest year 2023 (37 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (5); Appeal successful, conviction and sentence quashed (1); The appellant is set at liberty (1)
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (5); The appeal is dismissed. (1)
- Succession: Appeal dismissed (3); Application dismissed (3)
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application: Application dismissed (3); The application for certiorari and prohibition is granted. (1)
- Criminal Case: Application dismissed (2); Appeal upheld, Mr Malenya disqualified from representing the (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Penal Code (15)
- Criminal Procedure Code (14)
- Civil Procedure Act (5)
- Law of Succession Act (5)
- Evidence Act (4)
- Sexual Offences Act No 3 of 2006 (4)
- Sexual Offences Act (3)
- Probate and Administration Rules (3)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from original conviction and sentence (155), Appeal from a conviction and sentence (60), Appeal from the original trial outcome (24)
- [Criminal Revision] outcomes — Affirmed: 7/45, Application dismissed: 3/45, The bond terms are revised: 1/45, The order is not revised, but the execution is varied.: 1/45
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 62/308, Appeal Dismissed: 23/308, Appeal Disallowed: 22/308, Appeal successful: 21/308
- [Traffic Offence] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 1/1
- [Miscellaneous Criminal Application] outcomes — Granted: 2/13, Application dismissed: 2/13, Leave to appeal out of time granted: 1/13, Appeal to be heard on 6th February, 2013: 1/13
- [Appeal] outcomes — Appeal allowed: 1/6, Appeal dismissed: 1/6, Leave to appeal granted: 1/6, Appeal successful, conviction and sentence quashed: 1/6
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~5807 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Set at liberty (5)
- The Appellant is set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held (3)
- The appellant is set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held (3)
- Appellant set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held (2)
- Injunction (2)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.3
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (121), Criminal Procedure Code (91), Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 (82), Civil Procedure Act (24), Civil Procedure Rules (16)
Sample decisions
MOHAMED RASHID MRAJA V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1056 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1056 (KLR) · 14 November 2012
DANIEL ANGORE V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1181 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1181 (KLR) · 8 November 2012
GRANTON JANGANI NGOLO V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1185 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1185 (KLR)
SAMUEL NDORO V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1186 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1186 (KLR)
ALI HASSAN ABDALLA V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1367 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1367 (KLR) · 31 October 2012
TOM OKOTH ANYUMBA V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1368 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1368 (KLR)
MUTUNGA KAMUNZO V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1369 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1369 (KLR) · 31 October 2012
KITSAO MUDHENGI CHARO V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1450 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1450 (KLR) · 11 October 2012
PETER BARAZA V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 1555 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 1555 (KLR) · 15 October 2012
BILAL GAITHO & 4 OTHERS V REPUBLIC [2012] KEHC 371 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2012] KEHC 371 (KLR) · 6 December 2012