Phillip Ransley Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 2 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2001 to 2024; busiest year 2005 (101 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Suit: Dismissed (11); Application dismissed (3); Appeal dismissed (3)
- Civil: Dismissed (9); Application dismissed (6); Appeal dismissed (3); Application allowed with costs to the applicant. (2)
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (4)
- Miscellaneous Application: Respondent's application allowed (2); Application dismissed (2)
- Real Property Dispute: Dismissed with costs (2)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Rules (9)
- Civil Procedure Act (7)
- Companies Act (6)
- Registered Land Act (4)
- Advocates Act (4)
- Law Reform Act (3)
- O.39 rules 1 and 2 (2)
- Government Proceedings Act (2)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Remedy patterns
- Costs in cause. (1)
- A stay is granted on condition that the applicants pay into an interest-bearing account a sum of Kshs 700,000 to be held in the joint names of the advocates pending the determination of the appeal. (1)
Sample decisions
Tandor Restaurant Limited & 3 others v Estate of the Late Suresh Bhasin & 3 others [2004] KEHC 400 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 400 (KLR)
Bernard Mwangi Waweru v Naftal Maina Gathiari & another [2004] KEHC 506 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 506 (KLR) · 4 November 2004