Odaga Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 3 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from an original trial (1), Ex-parte award (1), Appeal from the original trial (1)
- [Industrial Dispute] outcomes — Award by consent entered: 1/2, Appeal dismissed: 1/2
- [Trade Dispute] outcomes — In favor of the Union: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~9037 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Payment of terminal dues and compensation (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.0
- Frequently applied statutes: Trade Disputes Act, Cap.234, Laws of Kenya (2), Trade Disputes Act, Cap. 234, Laws of Kenya (1)
Sample decisions
TAILORS & TEXTILES WORKERS’ UNION v BLANKET INDUSTRIES LTD [2002] KEELRC 16 (KLR)
Employment & Labour Relations Court · [2002] KEELRC 16 (KLR)
KENYA UNION OF DOMESTIC, HOTELS, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, HOSPITALS & ALLIED WORKERS v COAST GYMKHANA CLUB [2002] KEELRC 25 (KLR)
Employment & Labour Relations Court · [2002] KEELRC 25 (KLR) · 8 October 2002
KENYA UNION OF COMMERCIAL, FOOD & ALLIED WORKERS v AVERY KENYA LTD [2003] KEELRC 9 (KLR)
Employment & Labour Relations Court · [2003] KEELRC 9 (KLR) · 26 March 2003