Chesoni Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 156 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1982 to 2026; busiest year 2025 (73 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (36); Affirmed (10); Appeal allowed (8); Appeal successful (4)
- Appeal: Appeal dismissed (8); Affirmed (2)
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (4)
- Civil: The suit is dismissed. (3); Appeal dismissed (3); The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for want of prosecution. (2); Affirmed (2)
- Civil Suit: Application dismissed (3); Appeal dismissed (2)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (49)
- Civil Procedure Rules (34)
- Evidence Act (22)
- Penal Code (14)
- Criminal Procedure Code (14)
- Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (10)
- Law Reform Act (7)
- Constitution of Kenya (7)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from conviction and sentence (7), Appeal from a conviction and sentence (5), Second Appeal (5)
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 44/100, Appeal allowed: 9/100, Appeals dismissed: 6/100, Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed: 3/100
- [Appeal] outcomes — The appeal is dismissed.: 2/8, Appeal dismissed: 1/8, Appeal dismissed with costs: 1/8, The application is allowed.: 1/8
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 8/38, Appeal allowed: 8/38, Appeal dismissed with costs: 4/38, Affirmed: 2/38
- [civil] outcomes — Appeal allowed, High Court's order set aside, application for security for costs referred back to the High Court.: 1/7, Appeal dismissed: 1/7, The appellant's claim for payment for 114 days of terminal leave was dismissed.: 1/7, The application to adduce additional evidence is dismissed.: 1/7
- [civil appeal] outcomes — The appeal is struck out.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~11587 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Set appellant at liberty (2)
- The appellant is set free (2)
- The appellant must be set at liberty. (1)
- No order for costs of the appeal (1)
- Damages of Kshs 20,000 awarded to the appellant (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 0.8
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (26), Criminal Procedure Code (18), Penal Code (cap 63) (10), Criminal Procedure Code (cap 75) (6), Civil Procedure Act (3)
Sample decisions
Joseph Waruinge Njenga v Republic [1980] KECA 20 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1980] KECA 20 (KLR) · 26 March 1980
Johnson Nyoike Muiruri v Republic [1983] KECA 1 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1983] KECA 1 (KLR) · 15 April 1983
Harris Mwangikuria v Republic [1983] KECA 10 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1983] KECA 10 (KLR)
ELIAS APUDHO ODHOWO & 3 OTHERS vs REPUBLIC [1983] KECA 100 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1983] KECA 100 (KLR) · 23 June 1983
Nicholas Wachira v Republic [1983] KECA 101 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1983] KECA 101 (KLR) · 22 March 1983
HABIL JETI S/O OKORE vs REPUBLIC [1983] KECA 102 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1983] KECA 102 (KLR)
ROBINSON NDUNGU NJOROGE vs REPUBLIC [1983] KECA 103 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1983] KECA 103 (KLR) · 23 March 1983
GEORGE ADUOAL ODERA vs REPUBLIC [1983] KECA 104 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1983] KECA 104 (KLR)
JOSEPH NDUNGU vs ONESMUS MBUGUA [1983] KECA 107 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1983] KECA 107 (KLR) · 10 April 1983
Waweru Kariuki v Republic [1983] KECA 11 (KLR)
Court of Appeal · [1983] KECA 11 (KLR)