Platt Platt Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 183 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 1977 to 2026; busiest year 2024 (76 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (37); Affirmed (7); Appeal granted (7); Appeal allowed (6)
- Criminal Appeal: Appeal dismissed (23); Affirmed (6); Appeal allowed (4); Appeals dismissed (3)
- Appeal: Appeal dismissed (9); Dismissed with costs (4); Appeal granted (3); Appeal allowed (3)
- Civil: Appeal dismissed (9)
- Land Dispute: Appeal dismissed (4)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Civil Procedure Act (90)
- Civil Procedure Rules (88)
- Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (23)
- Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) (22)
- Civil Procedure Act (CPA) (18)
- Penal Code (13)
- Criminal Procedure Code (12)
- Court of Appeal Rules (7)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: First Appellate Court (5), Appeal from a lower court decision (4), Appeal from the original trial outcome (4)
- [civil] outcomes — The court allowed the plaintiff's claim for Shs 135,321/25.: 1/2, plaintiff's claims are not struck out: 1/2
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 15/58, Appeal allowed: 2/58, Appeal granted: 2/58, Motion dismissed: 2/58
- [Civil] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 5/24, Application dismissed: 2/24, Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of K£750 with costs and interest as prayed.: 1/24, The application for stay is dismissed.: 1/24
- [Contempt of Court] outcomes — The court ordered the respondents to be committed to prison for contempt.: 1/6, The court dismissed the application as the applicable law of contempt in the High Court of Justice in England, at the time the application was brought, should be followed.: 1/6, The court found the Respondents in contempt of court and ordered them to be committed to Civil Jail for a period not exceeding six (6) months or to such other or further punishment as the court shall find appropriate.: 1/6, The court ruled that the applicable law for contempt of court proceedings in Kenya is the English law applicable in England at the time the alleged contempt is committed.: 1/6
- [Inheritance Dispute] outcomes — Nzambi was not the lawful wife of Kituu and had no right to a share in his estate.: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~30181 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Stay of execution pending appeal (3)
- Spent (3)
- None (2)
- Costs awarded to the Respondent (2)
- costs of redecoration of Shs 2516 (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.9
- Frequently applied statutes: Civil Procedure Act (34), Civil Procedure Rules (29), Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) (12), Civil Procedure Act (CPA) (10), Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (6)
Sample decisions
East African Power and Lighting Co Ltd v Attorney General [1977] KEHC 7 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1977] KEHC 7 (KLR) · 16 December 1977
Auto Engineering Ltd v M Gonella & Co Ltd [1978] KEHC 6 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1978] KEHC 6 (KLR) · 30 November 1978
Esther Nkudate v Touring & Sporting Cars Ltd & another (Civil Case 1933 of 1978) [1979] KEHC 27 (KLR) (Civ) (8 June 1979) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [1979] KEHC 27 (KLR) · 8 June 1979
(Criminal Application 53 of 1981) [1981] KEHC 14 (KLR) (Crim) (10 April 1981) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [1981] KEHC 14 (KLR) · 10 April 1981
Anna Munini & another v Margaret Nzambi [1984] KEHC 22 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1984] KEHC 22 (KLR) · 14 May 1984
Waweru v Republic [1985] KEHC 98 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1985] KEHC 98 (KLR) · 27 September 1985
Thugge v Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd [1990] KEHC 63 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [1990] KEHC 63 (KLR)
Ruhangi Properties Limited & 2 others v Standard Chartered Bank of Kenya Ltd & 2 others [2000] KEHC 540 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2000] KEHC 540 (KLR) · 1 December 2000
M.M. KISOSO v EXPRESS (K) LIMITED [2001] KEHC 19 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2001] KEHC 19 (KLR) · 24 April 2001
Bahati Temo & 6 others v Swaleh Mohamed Swaleh [2002] KEHC 1173 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2002] KEHC 1173 (KLR) · 12 November 2002