Sellers Sellers Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 5 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2013 to 2026; busiest year 2016 (3 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Appeal: Affirmed (1)
- Civil Suit: The Defendant's application to strike out the Plaintiff's cl (1)
- Commercial Dispute: The Plaintiff's application to strike out the Defendant's St (1)
- Civil: The court denies the application for orders. (1); The application is partially granted. (1); The application to strike out the 1st Defendant's defence is (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Evidence Act, Cap 80 of the Laws of Kenya (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Defendant seeks to strike out Plaintiff's claim, Plaintiff seeks summary judgment, Defendant seeks leave to file Defence and Counterclaim out of time (1), Application to strike out Statement of Defence (1), Preliminary Objection to a Notice of Motion and Application for Orders (1)
- [Civil Suit] outcomes — The Defendant's application to strike out the Plaintiff's claim is dismissed, and the Defendant is granted leave to file its Defence and Counterclaim out of time.: 1/1
- [Commercial Dispute] outcomes — The Plaintiff's application to strike out the Defendant's Statement of Defence is dismissed.: 1/1
- [Civil] outcomes — The court denies the application for orders.: 1/3, The application is partially granted.: 1/3, The application to strike out the 1st Defendant's defence is dismissed.: 1/3
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~23944 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Costs of the application shall be in the cause (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.2
- Frequently applied statutes: Evidence Act, Cap 80 of the Laws of Kenya (1)
Sample decisions
China Sichuan Corporation for International Techno-Economic Co-Operation v Kigwe Complex Ltd [2013] KEHC 1678 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2013] KEHC 1678 (KLR) · 31 October 2013
Polythene Industries Limited v Buzeki Dairy Limited [2015] KEHC 8017 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2015] KEHC 8017 (KLR) · 30 October 2015
Renom Agency Limited v Muthoga Gaturu & Company Advocates & 3 others [2016] KEHC 2406 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2016] KEHC 2406 (KLR) · 19 August 2016
Parker House Radio Limited v Sony Corporation Japan & 2 others [2016] KEHC 7684 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2016] KEHC 7684 (KLR) · 22 April 2016
Telkom Kenya Limited v Chase Bank Limited & another [2016] KEHC 8481 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2016] KEHC 8481 (KLR)