Ojuang Ojuang Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 6 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2016 to 2024; busiest year 2020 (3 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Appeal dismissed (2)
- Employment Dispute: Claimant partially successful, awarded 1 month's salary and (1)
- Miscellaneous Application: The Reference filed on 11th March 2019 to vacate/set aside t (1); The Application is dismissed with costs (1)
- Tax Appeal: Dismissed with costs (1)
- Taxation of Costs: Application dismissed with costs (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Work Injuries and Benefits Act, 2007 (2)
- Employment Act (1)
- Section 45 of the Advocates Act (1)
- Advocates Remuneration Rules (1)
- Advocates Remuneration (Amendment) Order 2014 (1)
- Judges' Remuneration Order (1)
- Employment and Labour Relations Court Act (1)
- Arbitration Act 1995 (1)
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Application for review of Taxing Officer's decision (1), Application for review and remission of taxation of costs (1), Respondent/Applicant seeks to vacate and/or set aside the Ruling and Reasoning of Bill of Costs dated 7th July 2018 (1)
- [Tax Appeal] outcomes — Dismissed with costs: 1/1
- [Taxation of Costs] outcomes — Application dismissed with costs: 1/1
- [Miscellaneous Application] outcomes — The Reference filed on 11th March 2019 to vacate/set aside the Taxing Officer’s Ruling of 24th January 2019 is dismissed.: 1/2, The Application is dismissed with costs: 1/2
- [Civil Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 2/2
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~21591 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- Each party bears its own costs of the appeal (2)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 3.2
- Frequently applied statutes: Work Injuries and Benefits Act, 2007 (2), Advocates Remuneration (Amendment) Order 2014 (1), Judges' Remuneration Order (1), Section 45 of the Advocates Act (1), Advocates Remuneration Rules (1)
Sample decisions
Questworks Limited v Treboruamak Real Estate Investment Management Company Limited & 2 others [2020] KEHC 4421 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 4421 (KLR) · 22 June 2020
Tom Ojienda & Associates v KSC International Limited [2020] KEHC 5325 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 5325 (KLR)
Oluoch- Olunya & Associates Advocates v Parklane Construction Ltd [2020] KEHC 6258 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2020] KEHC 6258 (KLR) · 28 April 2020
Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates v Draft & Develop Engineers Limited [2021] KEHC 13215 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2021] KEHC 13215 (KLR) · 21 July 2021
Jumbo North (EA) Limited v Amani (Civil Appeal E019 of 2020) [2024] KEHC 14812 (KLR) (4 October 2024) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [2024] KEHC 14812 (KLR) · 4 October 2024
Jumbo North (EA) Limited v Angwenyi (Civil Appeal E005 of 2021) [2024] KEHC 7449 (KLR) (21 June 2024) (Judgment)
High Court of Kenya · [2024] KEHC 7449 (KLR) · 21 June 2024