Tenant/Applicant Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 2 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2019 to 2025; busiest year 2025 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Civil Appeal: Dismissed with costs (1)
- Civil Suit: The court dismissed the suit. (1)
- Judicial Review: The Ex Parte Applicants are entitled to prayers 1, 2, and 3 (1)
- Appeal: The court finds in favor of the applicants, allowing the app (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Limitation of Actions Act (1)
- Civil Procedure Act (1)
- County Government Act (1)
- Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act (1)
- Law Reform Act (1)
- Section 362 of the CPC (1)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Remedy patterns
- The Ex Parte Applicants are entitled to the relief sought in their Motion. (1)
Sample decisions
Kagambi & 21 others v Gatabaki (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E012 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 6922 (KLR) (14 October 2025) (Judgment)
Environment & Land Court · [2025] KEELC 6922 (KLR) · 14 October 2025
Mwai & 49 others (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E003 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 808 (KLR) (20 February 2025) (Judgment)
Environment & Land Court · [2025] KEELC 808 (KLR) · 20 February 2025