Ochieng Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 116 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Documented reasoning patterns
- Most common procedural postures: Appeal from original conviction and sentence (18), Appeal from conviction and sentence (12), Appeal from original trial (5)
- [Civil] outcomes — Dismissed with costs: 2/7, The application for dismissal of the suit is granted.: 1/7, Affidavit of Mr. John L. Gould shall be read out in court and admitted in evidence at the trial.: 1/7, Appeal dismissed: 1/7
- [Criminal Appeal] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 17/53, Affirmed: 2/53, Appeals dismissed: 2/53, Appeal successful, convictions and sentences quashed: 2/53
- [Defamation] outcomes — Judgment in favor of the plaintiff: 1/1
- [Civil Suit] outcomes — The court granted a stay of execution pending the determination of the objection.: 2/6, Appeal dismissed: 2/6, Dismissal of the Plaintiff's application: 1/6, The application is granted.: 1/6
- [Estate Distribution] outcomes — Appeal dismissed: 1/1
Writing characteristics
- Median judgment length ~15012 words
- Includes panel decisions
Remedy patterns
- The Assumption Sisters are given a last opportunity to prosecute the case. (1)
- Stay of execution pending the determination of the objection which the Plaintiffs have taken against the taxation. (1)
- Re-trial of the appellants (1)
- Quashing of convictions and sentences (1)
- Setting the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th appellants at liberty (1)
Citation patterns
- Avg cited authorities/decision: 1.1
- Frequently applied statutes: Penal Code (21), Criminal Procedure Code (14), Civil Procedure Act (6), Law of Succession Act (6), Sexual Offences Act (5)
Sample decisions
COPOS LTD v MR MAALIM & 23 OTHERS [2004] KEHC 1131 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1131 (KLR) · 26 January 2004
Mathew Mulinge Mutiso v Republic [2004] KEHC 1381 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1381 (KLR) · 21 September 2004
Joseph Kamau Kareri v Republic [2004] KEHC 1382 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 1382 (KLR) · 21 September 2004
ASSUMPTION SISTERS OF NAIROBI REGISTERED TRUSTEES v BESNON MUKUWA WACHIRA [2004] KEHC 2140 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 2140 (KLR) · 29 January 2004
Juma Mikidadi v Ali Khalfan & another [2004] KEHC 2665 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 2665 (KLR) · 2 November 2004
Copos Ltd v Maalim & 23 others [2004] KEHC 592 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2004] KEHC 592 (KLR) · 18 March 2004
Jatco Transporters & Tours Agency Ltd & another v Jason Njiru Kithinji & 4 others [2005] KEHC 1850 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2005] KEHC 1850 (KLR)
Jackson Kamau Ndegwa v Housing Finance Company of Kenya [2005] KEHC 1919 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2005] KEHC 1919 (KLR)
Frankline Kabugu & 2 others v Republic [2005] KEHC 221 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2005] KEHC 221 (KLR)
Jackson Kamau Ndegwa v Housing Finance Company of Kenya [2005] KEHC 2224 (KLR)
High Court of Kenya · [2005] KEHC 2224 (KLR)