Oduka Oduka Beta
Read this first — limitations.
- Patterns reflect published decisions only.
- This is not an assessment of private character, integrity or bias.
- Outcome distributions are per case-type and not comparable across courts/years.
- Based on 1 decision(s); small samples are indicative only.
- Name normalization is automatic and may merge or split judges incorrectly.
Main subject areas
Activity
Published decisions from 2017 to 2020; busiest year 2020 (2 decisions).
Documented outcomes by case type
- Sports Dispute: The petition is dismissed. (1)
- Constitutional Petition: The Petition was dismissed. (1)
- Civil Appeal: The appeal is allowed, and the judgment of the trial court i (1)
Counts are per published decision as classified by AI; not comparable across courts or years.
Most-cited legislation
- Sports Act of 2013 (1)
- Arbitration Act, 1995 (1)
- Land Disputes Tribunal Act No. 18 of 1990 (1)
Writing characteristics
- Too few decisions to characterize writing structure
Remedy patterns
- Declaration that the judgment of Sotik RM Misc Application No. 2 of 2009 infringed on the petitioner’s constitutional rights. (1)
- Declaration that section 7(2) of the now repealed Land Disputes Tribunal Act No. 18 of 1990 was invalid. (1)
- Quashing of the judgment of Sotik SRM Misc Application No. 2 of 2009 between Mary Chemitet Mosonik and Chepkwony Chelule & Brothers. (1)
Sample decisions
Chepkwony Chelule v Senior Resident Magistrate Sotik Law Courts & 2 others [2017] KEELC 267 (KLR)
Environment & Land Court · [2017] KEELC 267 (KLR) · 23 October 2017